On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:45:15 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:

> > > I figured that would make the example more confusion which would
> > > defeat the purpose.  
> 
> > And don't get me started on people using "which" when they should be
> > using "that".
> > 
> > (In this case, which is correct but it should have a preceding
> > comma).  
> 
> One could also use "that" with a preceding semicolon.

One could, although it would subtly change the message, adding more
emphasis to the second clause.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

In a classified ad: "Tired of cleaning yourself? Let me do it."