From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75B3B138206 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 10:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 814E1E086B; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 10:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF46E0848 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 10:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [81.108.251.46] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eVawg-0001QI-Ty for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 10:34:22 +0000 Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5A22366604 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 10:34:22 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 10:34:17 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [was: What can cause printer to crop top of page?] /etc/papersize is ignored Message-ID: <20171231103417.16be2eae@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <2024436.hqgmcn6Cq0@peak> References: <9349542.N0JEzlDTSJ@dell_xps> <26462848-1442-965e-8673-792e56bb0ea5@gmail.com> <5A47A380.20504@youngman.org.uk> <2024436.hqgmcn6Cq0@peak> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/F+QeuXurRJwob/5Ta26H/9I"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [81.108.251.46] Feedback-ID: 81.108.251.46 X-Archives-Salt: 7f6540e7-5177-4e1f-ab2c-5543ee6fc9b7 X-Archives-Hash: daf295384227b94219387827f35dd512 --Sig_/F+QeuXurRJwob/5Ta26H/9I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 02:26:26 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Actually it was the New York World. So actually imho it was originally > > perfectly legit. =20 >=20 > I don't agree. In that case it should have been called the New York > World Series. If they were paying for it, they could call it what they wanted. I assume the paper was generally known as "The World" otherwise it would have been a waste of marketing money. --=20 Neil Bothwick Few women admit their age. Few men act theirs. --Sig_/F+QeuXurRJwob/5Ta26H/9I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE8k9T/rX16EJxEKG692eFu0QSMJgFAlpIvSkACgkQ92eFu0QS MJifiBAAiotavJM8Fo5yD1UT8rAvjVOaDlX8JH6eVlRy8C6/CLa0idhTZXVwm4TR a7Pn4X30Jq0UsmdQsYjVdmVSBXxyJ71p/nK8wklJ/74lJSJIxIRYwtXJ7qYJAIgT nmEZL17MeLIXXlazfMpRayANbnMxgltUdDcHYNQRataxCJLJgSS3+6GH4rxW4NzT 49ORwDmDvwr76/OhKaGzmzeoAJYZuvEkKyKswuazBxQJw/vL2NuD77sSh01a+PJf 2Oj2mBSdNy9gOzHuM6jT6hY+PO/1abxFWmiSGbhcWIm83C0tmo+F5uWrznejoRtn P10qrlA3SZ7Uosa4sdnhgXmQNpHSODHNWjCV3kdkyOOis4CAwUd/6omghguNitWC 2Tt1x0WhFOH2xltLtqA7tMi03S64BRzNBd+MBIdsw9vyuLx+qnB0bb1tjUdk4zNT tBltJTTzefp1PTu4S+WN3oGzkkx5E3DBSIwOfFFy37K96lz1ZADatQt554IeXc5w vXKjunnVKSLOyz9R66uBXd3B2c8hs54HRjlbAvIfqQeMSvxzvRPOHBMilWJFI/q3 y0B9RNbTgG4Nd7nAH2hw+GPXBezwN+ZAHf270ydnddzVrkChfX3g1c9aYCrZqicB ypn6F3FleXhw5xk2qdmyE8MG5UYVizm3Prd7vIyS10gD4Fiaxu4= =gUxg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/F+QeuXurRJwob/5Ta26H/9I--