public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] neomutt package broken?
@ 2017-12-20 10:29 Christoph Böhmwalder
  2017-12-20 11:10 ` Stephan Lukasczyk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Böhmwalder @ 2017-12-20 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 636 bytes --]

Hi everyone,

It seems to me that I'm either doing something very wrong or that the
neomutt package recently broke.  I just attempted an update and it can't
seem to find BerkeleyDB anymore.  I can't seem to recall changing
anything significant since the previous update (no USE changes, etc).

Any neomutt users out there who can confirm/refute this behaviour?
Alternatively, any pointers on what I might have messed up would also be
much appreciated.

Attached are build.log, config.log (no idea what's going on in there,
but the build output said to include it), emerge --info, and emerge -pqv
output.

Thanks!

--
Regards,
Christoph

[-- Attachment #2: logs.tar.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 5932 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] neomutt package broken?
  2017-12-20 10:29 [gentoo-user] neomutt package broken? Christoph Böhmwalder
@ 2017-12-20 11:10 ` Stephan Lukasczyk
  2017-12-20 13:26   ` Christoph Böhmwalder
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Lukasczyk @ 2017-12-20 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 872 bytes --]

Hi Christoph,

On 2017-12-20 11:29:08, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
>It seems to me that I'm either doing something very wrong or that the
>neomutt package recently broke.  I just attempted an update and it can't
>seem to find BerkeleyDB anymore.  I can't seem to recall changing
>anything significant since the previous update (no USE changes, etc).
>
>Any neomutt users out there who can confirm/refute this behaviour?
>Alternatively, any pointers on what I might have messed up would also be
>much appreciated.

I can confirm this behaviour.  On my machine, it could not find the
installed version of BerkeleyDB (some 6.x).  Installing sys-libs/db:5.3
(BerkeleyDB 5.3.x) solved the problem for me.

Best,
  Stephan

-- 
Stephan Lukasczyk
GPG-Key: 0x06E03C26B90F403D
Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question.
And the answer is "No".

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] neomutt package broken?
  2017-12-20 11:10 ` Stephan Lukasczyk
@ 2017-12-20 13:26   ` Christoph Böhmwalder
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Böhmwalder @ 2017-12-20 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:10:54PM +0100, Stephan Lukasczyk wrote:
> I can confirm this behaviour.  On my machine, it could not find the
> installed version of BerkeleyDB (some 6.x).  Installing sys-libs/db:5.3
> (BerkeleyDB 5.3.x) solved the problem for me.
> 
> Best,
>  Stephan

Thanks for the hint, after I merged sys-libs/db:5.3 I hit this bug: [0].
After enabling the 'doc' USE flag it installed fine and appears to work.

[0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/641132

--
Regards,
Christoph


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-20 13:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-20 10:29 [gentoo-user] neomutt package broken? Christoph Böhmwalder
2017-12-20 11:10 ` Stephan Lukasczyk
2017-12-20 13:26   ` Christoph Böhmwalder

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox