From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3491A139083 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 04:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C38E7E1007; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 04:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from very.loosely.org (very.loosely.org [173.255.215.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6636BE0FF8 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 04:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.8.78.6] (port=40450 helo=matica.foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eOFqg-0005Yf-93 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 20:37:50 -0800 Received: from itz by matica.foolinux.mooo.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eOFqW-0000mI-Cu for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 20:37:40 -0800 Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 20:37:40 -0800 From: Ian Zimmerman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory? Message-ID: <20171211043740.okfwknuax5c4ouep@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <6582741.F9gJHCEsXr@dell_xps> <2343494.DDJaQvByiF@dell_xps> <20171210210139.rm63ja4rdyrb2ewo@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Loosely-Listed: yes User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170707-dirty (1.8.3) X-Archives-Salt: a636293c-78bf-4668-9a0c-f9b81687a306 X-Archives-Hash: 9c8ad68d5c5261ada18ad42789f558e4 On 2017-12-10 21:31, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > You just don't notice udisks, it's quietly running in the background > doing its thing without taking either much disk space, memory, nor CPU > usage. I know Dr. Valdés will not respond but maybe someone else will, as this is a factual question. Last time I met udisks in person, it polled all drives on the system every second. Has that changed? -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.