From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 664A2139083 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 551BFE0FBE; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA46CE0F17 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([79.223.111.191]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lm2lZ-1ewfPm1iBl-00ZgRD for ; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 16:38:27 +0100 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:38:26 +0100 From: tuxic@posteo.de To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Update is blocked by ots previous version...? Message-ID: <20171208153826.cxzycsvagjynnubd@solfire> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References:<20171208023611.zdkmtwejqupsqorx@solfire> <20171208081855.69214705@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To:<20171208081855.69214705@digimed.co.uk> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171027 Sender: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:JpF6/C+yvvZT7atSd744pC7XDYf6ZnmFH1JRnfTpiDmSG4FH5bO Bn6dwDLwT596LWpwZu1PtnBswp9NTIPwSgu14nqmzj63RtjllRpeRee+oo5i+x2c+QUPzir kmrO3PMmtsmC13XyhuU6kHbKrJUxbAsdqlequcyndK/RfALmSiFpirZaGGzPS9vSOwTEm0O V4NZT0N44TeJ+omOAvB+w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:XZR7TN3B/tM=:+FGvx/1I91eC07hiKQSu47 vWD0DEn7PUvl0hOiQcKDS+G6Wzv/MCGsnH9es/44qCk3OX31uZAUdSi41t7kP8MuvhWqY86x+ F6fCsnJ1nV7mmbXSeKAr8kxODJmIONQpBDikH6hbclAc4JEEITFX1mlQGlTDDVTPO5r0aF2b2 MyX2f+NReokf+77AZNd+3M3sLQTDQVp8Ngk4AGGuNwRA0bZY77ryzdzvJiqP0fzQUcMNEbCXH a2jAVkX8zwFvSx9mSuk9EZP5fF+r+T1PQAl9hMbCkVG/qOwTo6agtEdvISezZ+YKLxzPBKDJg e0aIZoSrS1ToAlg0+nUltp96aB342PDxGhognNV3UO+K9mowV9Wp4xIXET5HEhrOVUPhTkN0J TAO3fD6jQvYH3Lnh2sJcRnWAQb/ogZLgWqpewqUL9Zdb5eBf0ZGQwqoTjwbpa5MjAkToIkUxh aXWOCXHQ2zjoDpTqT7fmBo0NDT7uWxNf+QwtACv7pa54t/rn28BVWjHZLur3KJXE0PkuJ53k7 bB8/uEx4ZFgIJn/XR1y29mVjiMJxzj7ozkTIyLrS1dhCp9JgXf67QfDPuESNr//pFkK3o+Aqg wCNyG3zNXhCT49cxw7zr/g8ukgAUReriUisLjP7XL6ztfMXaValdDasLqMr+UAUml9sV8fVRs IGL2/lJ4/jh0BFI6Wvx0w3raH35I+UKD2PUKIxMAe+M5wixDCgDE+eA7TKg/mi9HKX7IfybQB F3RZb/sYtyteHHfM75ncHAHQsCPpqMdQ4FLYv5JPGJmOGleZD5xC4pK3H1Jng9eXl+s6mmkIb ztNpVgv0TPtu0l3dX+GuAp1j9poJQ== X-Archives-Salt: 6824ed62-bf68-43aa-b02c-2c584bebce8a X-Archives-Hash: e44fdc37d2d4dfd79cf01f2e20fa3f3c On 12/08 08:18, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 03:36:11 +0100, tuxic@posteo.de wrote: > > > | WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a > > | dependency conflict: > > | > > | app-emulation/containerd:0 > > | > > | (app-emulation/containerd-1.0.0:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for > > | merge) conflicts with ~app-emulation/containerd-1.0.0_beta2_p20171019 > > | required by (app-emulation/docker-17.11.0:0/0::gentoo, installed) > > | ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > > I removed containerd yesterday and installed it again only to get the > > same error this morning again. > > > > Any away around this? > > There is an update to containerd available but docker depends > specifically on the older version. So portage is telling you it is not > updating containerd as this may break docker. It may be worth filing a > bug against docker if it should work with containerd-1.0.0. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > This man is depriving a village somewhere of an idiot Hi Neil, ok...I see...thanks a lot for the explanation! Cheers Meino