From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B52A9139083 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 00:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0C86E1074; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 00:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A419E106C for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 00:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tp ([88.75.172.43]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZkv0-1edrG81Hfa-00LUn4 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 01:13:30 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 01:13:28 +0100 From: Frank Steinmetzger To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6 Message-ID: <20171207001328.GC5249@tp> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <5A218A49.3050004@youngman.org.uk> <20171206232829.GA5249@tp> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt 1.7.2; VIM - Vi IMproved 8.0 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hp/KqLRflNohwAsoCKtYldCXgCifalFgfSrpesTGj4D7DxVG6p6 jvYkQ1wns2NKsiOc8PIT8YEfGrQbiElRhXYrZmL7SdB20pj7Cc5z/0eaHynaPSCNWbaOTxD hrx3xC/YJRSXMr7c04HdUHksTqbe6T1ncZ752RztYam9A6uTnEElseCD08mrwUbTEP5jv4S 49N9o36AinUj9EId64IaQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:aAqjtc8mi10=:coh90tAWgJujj+tx0x1Yjy gb4oOJ3NRYCmtw873IyDCDnzX3jjSMiB6MKW2+kR+gH0lBDACTskpPlbUU2N1FklTIa+3xEqG UztRHVJfP2VaSo9ApO0DNnK0h6A4G+lxMMYcSNxSjAXcAzI63PNfprWHPk1KuGK2CgM7WN06w N8iIvPZulIVRloCt0IyrNYMTs3aPeXZ/X8wt6kXJtqV3VowuCRDs7FsHznI2Civx9H8mYFi3K 6mpxslZFIAymkTMeSe3/dKd49zQwMVOx2P6s8ZlOhbLmzMLQV+aY7z9BE1vdkgU2HgLjBqDTY ZnNg6fPfPYZHWz/ac7WVHKzOkFLsFuAmqzAmXUJPk4AwJQ5bVbe7DpXhAmMCBBjXpEkMZKMNK jXubfUwFgnS40n3YwngmFg5Em7hJGYb7WflXyzB5GYWlE7f5vTmbq6/HPzotyQWk2Sj2KU5G2 IWqIxMIlkMkGdg8X/cfrt3gjz8KY4E4ti0fSXpnp4NXvn2CSGQLxaZSTS9uSZWipPhnR8Jfgu SrEQiCa5K/vOmzGPxn1Q5O8tcK0kP3zs84dHTGeW0OuE1GZDzhd3mZBEkQxf9PQ/s/zGgP7XW YGcTJMPia+Ut3kTm9VET510Sf7Qp/u3OSHibZ+GbfTPPuSl8a8i2nfpQ1XcoWWjiCvHX/MU4G Q6slul/MXQDn4nO+uTrJlYywMZ4vORcPh2Kj+Eg6jomYcZE1o1h0YAUzVxuXaxc28Gw4rm0/b nOhVWMLoDA6qtWXtfW9QgYmFDG3c9N2hY065JAhRtx3rwXVBQEkdWag2GaTzLPeZLv8EkQWmu WZawmg4xjpAqr3qTYhMbiqNIBRgAw== X-Archives-Salt: 9e5d7082-243b-425e-9e61-509b4e54b49c X-Archives-Hash: 79521ce143224e2dadcc41f8da3a60a6 --XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 06:35:10PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > I don=E2=80=99t really care about performance. It=E2=80=99s a simple me= dia archive powered > > by the cheapest Haswell Celeron I could get (with 16 Gigs of ECC RAM th= ough > > ^^). Sorry if I more or less stole the thread, but this is almost the s= ame > > topic. I could use a nudge in either direction. My workplace=E2=80=99s = storage > > comprises many 2=C3=97 mirrors, but I am not a company and I am capped = at four > > bays. > > > > So, Do you have any input for me before I fetch the dice? > > >=20 > IMO the cost savings for parity RAID trumps everything unless money > just isn't a factor. Cost saving compared to what? In my four-bay-scenario, mirror and raidz2 yield the same available space (I hope so). --=20 Gru=C3=9F | Greetings | Qapla=E2=80=99 Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. Advanced mathematics have the advantage that you can err more accurately. --XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEVbE9o2D2lE5fhoVsizG+tUDUMMoFAlooh6gACgkQizG+tUDU MMpBdw//bKerxWGzZj30/Bs79y0EnqM7nV+9K6+lqlAph0HSLvBjAdWZ0r2ssDb2 s7Js4vOtK/0n7lPBWm+64PToGF3rtW1bboaY53NHGcbpGo4ISSnmyk3Bc0rYXEN9 si1y9S+sO5dnFVxLYKeF3gtGykE5/RPaR2aaVGirtl+80ugQQ56BMV0832vlJ2Qf b0G+e8A5OAPlHDmdPCOKo/MzeSqFVCWoXK7pgt0hxfakH7tf1aQ5fNJowqetskRn lna7bhpYZZnwHRJEJuEuRnGqP7Tjcm70dPyohMKduV9QyrmYpeFw4k+KMRccIVq/ FJ21W+2xws+BEwvIlhkj1fOJClilMf+LuB8t1wFL2PR3utDAy53/CtJCXwLE1//P hNUEZwZ+yJ8sPia9BXMhrrnD0UVAl83+d5pTwgggvIGkB2MLqUTi73g0GZvWWyBT dn3DQ/FqBrBozFXQaV20M6XTVcKz5Kkx8F5SqjCE9FHWTmj64Pixjhxf7Q33Sg33 zgYuJyQ018V+jS1WpvZJI4QpZUGbmHhw/a6eHLbKcYFlrLQY6h+M81jPFN6zepeO 2kof9pyHbQUgat4bQVt3qKGxE1l+Rx+Wg6vVkF8laSd+dms5pDixmxM0k0iYAnQi zO/uXRAfrAJ9vuI+9aaQS3yTEr2RlNKsci2hglyx4zQmIXxQK1c= =IH0V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00--