From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20F30139083 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AD4CE105C; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from very.loosely.org (very.loosely.org [173.255.215.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C28BE104C for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.8.78.6] (port=48286 helo=matica.foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eMjTU-00079G-Os for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 15:51:36 -0800 Received: from itz by matica.foolinux.mooo.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eMjTN-0002za-CO for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 15:51:29 -0800 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:51:29 -0800 From: Ian Zimmerman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: is multi-core really worth it? Message-ID: <20171206235129.hppvfdpcj3s6uij7@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <6b5fbeca-453c-f103-5e4e-a8db83a6dabf@st.com> <6661527.9k004Oio64@eve> <1768467.U8M6HPhz0d@peak> <20171205215627.6fec87e3@digimed.co.uk> <5A27F0BC.6000802@youngman.org.uk> <5A2815D3.2040108@youngman.org.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5A2815D3.2040108@youngman.org.uk> X-Loosely-Listed: yes User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170707-dirty (1.8.3) X-Archives-Salt: 6bdad9aa-39ab-4e1c-9726-fe46d5eb59a1 X-Archives-Hash: fa87747b64b9177ad25b91d629d7d006 On 2017-12-06 16:07, Wols Lists wrote: > The contents of /var/tmp are expected to survive a system crash, as that > is where vi, emacs, libreoffice et al are expected to store their > recovery logs. The case of vi has recently been discussed extensively on oss-security :-P As for emacs, that's just incorrect. By default, it puts its recovery files in the same directory as the original file. But of course it can be configured differently like everything in emacs. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.