public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 00:28:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171206232829.GA5249@tp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_mnXWDYPsTv9gHo-f+Gk_fD9zRm5izP1GsmOBq4c1pGTw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2166 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:14:12PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk> wrote:
> > On 27/11/17 22:30, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> >> […]
> >> Is anyone here successfully using btrfs raid 5/6?  What is the status of
> >> scrub and self healing?  The btrfs wiki is woefully out of date :(
> >>
> > […]
> > Thing is, with raid-6 over four drives, you have a 100% certainty of
> > surviving a two-disk failure. With raid-10 you have a 33% chance of
> > losing your array.
> >
>  […]
> I tend to be a fan of parity raid in general for these reasons.  I'm
> not sure the performance gains with raid-10 are enough to warrant the
> waste of space.
> […]
> and when I finally moved it to ZFS
> […]

I am about to upgrade my Gentoo-NAS from 2× to 4×6 TB WD Red (non-pro). The
current setup is a ZFS mirror. I had been holding off the purchase for months,
all the while pondering on which RAID scheme to use. First it was raidz1 due
to space (I only have four bays), but eventually discarded it due to reduced
resilience.

Which brought me to raidz2 (any 2 drives may fail). But then I came across
that famous post by a developer on “You should always use mirrors unless you
are really really sure what you’re doing”. The main points were higher strain
on the entire array during resilvering (all drives nead to read everything
instead of just one drive) and easier maintainability of a mirror set (e.g.
faster and easier upgrade).

I don’t really care about performance. It’s a simple media archive powered
by the cheapest Haswell Celeron I could get (with 16 Gigs of ECC RAM though
^^). Sorry if I more or less stole the thread, but this is almost the same
topic. I could use a nudge in either direction. My workplace’s storage
comprises many 2× mirrors, but I am not a company and I am capped at four
bays.

So, Do you have any input for me before I fetch the dice?

-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network.

All PCs are compatible. Some are just more compatible than others.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-06 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-27 22:30 [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6 Bill Kenworthy
2017-12-01 15:59 ` J. Roeleveld
2017-12-01 16:58 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-01 17:14   ` Rich Freeman
2017-12-01 17:24     ` Wols Lists
2017-12-06 23:28     ` Frank Steinmetzger [this message]
2017-12-06 23:35       ` Rich Freeman
2017-12-07  0:13         ` Frank Steinmetzger
2017-12-07  0:29           ` Rich Freeman
2017-12-07 21:37             ` Frank Steinmetzger
2017-12-07 21:49               ` Wols Lists
2017-12-07 22:35                 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2017-12-07 23:48                   ` Wols Lists
2017-12-09 16:58                     ` J. Roeleveld
2017-12-09 18:28                       ` Wols Lists
2017-12-09 23:36                         ` Rich Freeman
2017-12-10  9:45                           ` Wols Lists
2017-12-10 15:07                             ` Rich Freeman
2017-12-10 21:00                               ` Wols Lists
2017-12-11  1:33                                 ` Rich Freeman
2017-12-11 23:20                 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2017-12-12 10:15                   ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-12 12:18                     ` Wols Lists
2017-12-12 13:24                       ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-07  7:54         ` Richard Bradfield
2017-12-07  9:28           ` Frank Steinmetzger
2017-12-07  9:52             ` Richard Bradfield
2017-12-07 14:53               ` Frank Steinmetzger
2017-12-07 15:26                 ` Rich Freeman
2017-12-07 16:04                   ` Frank Steinmetzger
2017-12-07 23:09                     ` Rich Freeman
2017-12-07 20:02                 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-07 18:35               ` Wols Lists
2017-12-07 20:17                 ` Richard Bradfield
2017-12-07 20:39                   ` Wols Lists

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171206232829.GA5249@tp \
    --to=warp_7@gmx.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox