From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08EE139083 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D3B3E103E; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA20DE0FF6 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [81.108.251.46] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eMLCb-0000Xs-Ta for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:56:33 +0000 Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7628567FF3 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:56:33 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:56:27 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it? Message-ID: <20171205215627.6fec87e3@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1768467.U8M6HPhz0d@peak> References: <6b5fbeca-453c-f103-5e4e-a8db83a6dabf@st.com> <6661527.9k004Oio64@eve> <1768467.U8M6HPhz0d@peak> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/3Im8UjK=LYAcW3+IvwdndtJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-smarthost01d-IP: [81.108.251.46] Feedback-ID: 81.108.251.46 X-Archives-Salt: 7a531376-2245-4d0c-a09f-e73251635a1e X-Archives-Hash: 81ee92ac6737727aa84905c65576f030 --Sig_/3Im8UjK=LYAcW3+IvwdndtJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 05 Dec 2017 10:09:56 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: > $ grep tmpfs /etc/fstab > tmpfs /var/tmp/portage tmpfs > noatime,uid=3Dportage,gid=3Dportage,mode=3D0775 0 0 > tmpfs /tmp tmpfs > noatime,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=3D1777 0 0 Or you could set PORTAGE_TMPDIR to /tmp to save the second mount. > If a tmpfs fills up, the excess gets swapped out, but with 32GB RAM > here I haven't yet seen any swap used at all - not even in an emerge -e > world. You can increase the memory available to it with the size option. size=3D75% works for m, even if building chromium and LO at the same time. --=20 Neil Bothwick Tribble math: * + * =3D *********************************** --Sig_/3Im8UjK=LYAcW3+IvwdndtJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE8k9T/rX16EJxEKG692eFu0QSMJgFAlonFgsACgkQ92eFu0QS MJhoAxAAgfgbX30SoAF73LZ4y3EBAsRGDgNTx8+tw1jocDbiJrdy6q7Tu+T3h0+n j77I/kvktVFnYZB7LAVOkhdCb+WuuAR1hTImUrMEiiYH04b9yP7KfpfEFZwN/4S5 RTmRfhwDA7DPO+cJivEeV1gKHr3J4fMt0QhtVA6kB0l5Oz8Q1vUQfRY2JQDNUwkb 8rBtHnkFQqI9KkiewDW6x1J3792IRBFRxCzHwbk8AA1beL9L4Krz7Pq/zAKBgqvR Pme2ifCJ4KoXw83ZT9XR4zURuG0RuDOMColUmN1HrKXt9MVSSYFWUAWMh4J7vRT1 87/wMjS2DgXlNdUREoZwpU9haJReMSn5qtndOGbBInjJkmjaT92zVggt9ZMZOL1/ 8rUbQdyR77uww/uBVEUDRloW0BbcoRBYqciqqDLXCw8h0xKmKT8ICYMTO90KFoH6 GjNtdf+nkx0EJ2rGXs7papZezndaI6a0rsk/nQ0JHJB/LUeUfBWx+aTeFGhRjuJh cXHg70NAnjaIrrAiYhr4pSJ1OP4wQrwKu3qd39b6MPBin/3NZIvn/rD0qppCko4C 3Ankq5IhukWhj4V4Ab2KzmaKBLT765S9Y5AgHFt7MxrOgdxsrs9uhO7f7Ai1IEC4 WXnwgJk6t2f/bBpAlu3vW/pCDUx3WBFJhyDKdgcZHlJdVc7Ub4w= =uAbk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3Im8UjK=LYAcW3+IvwdndtJ--