From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84583139083 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BE28E0E9E; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F3E0E0E82 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([79.223.107.175]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LdKs1-1emKki1aL3-00iXF1 for ; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 19:06:25 +0100 Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 19:06:24 +0100 From: tuxic@posteo.de To: Gentoo Subject: [gentoo-user] How to check for PIE-code ? Message-ID: <20171203180624.4joywt7vsq6vgxef@solfire> Mail-Followup-To: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171027 Sender: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:n3OG8C4ElKJJDLd91jEd6nvDikjU8a7MFbZzxLtCLSx0nD9Iken Y70KSIr4sGdAMUEhDnLQNiiGSB568TZaX+9eWaK98/Oq58S8rGWDgNsGt1V5VyiOwK+Wpoc 6flrPZRZH3471ZBMxNslurFeTBW3F6Ch4IAnXAsN9bWYZmKzK15GYXmBAtrksQzQE4UUUCX PEvmhG2BQcMxLUhnRdLeQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fwv66+oKCes=:bk79DrDp+s5QWiZmQ8yO87 WW83tAKruHW1xDc344KlpDaM1hTO9aUdIbB5fY6I/YSo0Sl7QfLMavOx6Lj2aw4hVTMGEiLt1 aCGB+ZUDcp3yXof2Ii0WCAGBVECJMtiZ/iKkYLynucIiirEqDsyobcJs96Bx1YknqaisF9ObS mb5KW6d1GFUTut9kUDHbAdHn7C12QfDCuo6px8aUJFJ3FEd0xapA+wGYE45zshWAIoI7RhTug 5AaWiOgeneqOpHywriWOMyVwF+8EPLjGNLypsx+O64pwF+uQw9MV9DPinM5YEwyqrm44LTo6o QBlUepPwvE8nv8MfxbVTeD56MmSR+czy7ML+gJ436XqF2/l6Kc5wdw7YW5kvxrL9qwAyDgrPs bDz3FUIK1NiszUUhVqNktarCJ7WdhfqbF71mToYn8irQyn1WdUY9d6lE3iUpvVHvgaunVgZm4 H5iXMBrlOoa4bCHO2h0I6Ef89YJIGHY/dUsV7FfNKDmx/KRx768uoTjZqmMiHyCpTii6WaRsq IV23sg8VTqmg6xUzMN0kPoanvzcRD3ioI5V9I1xXSaxaZ/7kTEScTtKK4c0s1WJRy2bSf+z61 7zPG/Bn5FCqRapl2dR3oEUFgwmSh5ER6ZB0dQkrSAv2XSQVRAH5onxQwrXx1ZH2naL2yxHL/e t/BsypfebT7umjTIN1CwKkGWDZzX5veJTon7anSlb0yWZe9P45IoMF8m9lOAxUYnNiYbyjU7W WXV8icgwZs0PqViwqX5FZF6+eKoGliKXgtknUs3jqZ2pp0YARIPp/7VBhHitLwx61JEs46OuE 11yvUOAc2LyFrblhLb0is2V1YY8mA== X-Archives-Salt: 540fdb32-c703-4583-84ae-b18626c68858 X-Archives-Hash: 7e9e11399a58e91a8efbc505f73ef851 Hi, is there any way to check, whether a compilated binary is using the position-independant-code feature or is still build according to old standards? Cheers Meino