From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA584139083 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 04:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37878E0FEB; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 04:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A722E0F73 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 04:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([79.223.107.175]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIu7d-1eNHwN3WNF-002Vj8 for ; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 05:43:51 +0100 Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 05:43:39 +0100 From: tuxic@posteo.de To: Gentoo Subject: [gentoo-user] Emerge does want to tell me...what? Message-ID: <20171203044339.egi6467qif26m7zi@solfire> Mail-Followup-To: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171027 Sender: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:XQYDG8coM8lqUPt3eGxVnKOZtsIJRMXnUnA858z8/CjEnqsjUKl v24WKRGqduAJwdbJy1HVi4YWxEs1Cd4oAjOPq3QpFysuHjKCEnmbdVovy8+Y0+0rQuirS4h RHgeqmZPZ29mDSwjaAXJN0ADSjrWnr7xNsixCCWiYsSgLDIC41yIVIKYuiWxc55dFCwQcnV m/cfL7bzzlwuKbVJWh6hQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:LkawtXbeogM=:oTCLhAR3viVVhQsCfn9c1a o5RoXSeHkXEIHsygEG2Hz7pypncVLW5W0VhJ9R5DuerLehdC0QNn6VInY91268VJF3bsBK3+P S/3whoVdyjNOCo0Tgkoqq+i2eS0V7TJe+qw+DbJyNsOsQslyzXAeqo/wpgHK/ZJJHmiDGrjfR t0y4umWUQcpLMfAgOwymTRK62ahPIdN5CU/dezZXOLosC2axzmuPoJ+6lRpGAbZCjIIAWM3QH PEsgUYJ6RT6hPsZZxEexAvCSUexBjZMs8STPCOzktl72uxHSha3U2wyMi3FbKwcA2SdnJKnVD zEbHAjvLPeKn5DVo+YNgJcpmnSqDxY7Gfcj4zucvHitnzvPK3dLmeci43z8jqgCvqazEriPh6 8GnTHX4tDBbcEVYE7z8l+dR8fYWmaapPbx0BXa7fu6WLc1kwfNlqrTVvjkM6uNB0wL4kKYjXy VIYAJjUoBtGMbH00+Z1lNEOTCObCq32+M/FnAyml6sGsYladOn090IZ5pPreol63cw9bn/5F/ EChuu5yl/6fO3rzFPtQyJiGVghCmhfty+KTcfJVxWfyuI47kxZeCcFAwFEmGHtt+xeCw0qFHf L8hkl4wRkWI1hpsrhtb8ZXW3Z8Tfoz90JRA/hUiQYVknFbDuLij5kTCgwB5OlCierpKcChGVD 0vTcSufxGuiVMTKzwwRidirYjmPlX8v3jajGkKvEsS3Orurt4PoQuzco44blPzFCJg+5p5Kyq NNZHf4n4XcPMar1wrC32D8SwVj6d0iq/1RnKwrZx4lfqHi6F9a+lhbDpcjDwl4kiFxz9GQgb4 ooEyhzv5bqT6nHv7cS2g+LhaJSWfGBW2yoozEwmuCPbvkGWnuc= X-Archives-Salt: aa76f164-b2ed-4535-85aa-8007635eef60 X-Archives-Hash: fcb9a73e21ae9e5d07b140d61aa50cab Hi, I started emerge -e @world and it stops with this message: The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details) # required by @selected # required by @world (argument) # /usr/portage/profiles/releases/17.0/package.mask: # Andreas K. Huettel (27 May 2017) # In the 17.0 profiles we assume that our system compiler uses C++14 # or later as default language setting. This means it has to be at # least GCC 6. If you need an older compiler for specific purposes, # feel free to unmask it, however, using it for normal emerging of # packages is neither recommended nor supported in any way. =sys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r3 # required by @selected # required by @world (argument) # /usr/portage/profiles/releases/17.0/package.mask: # Andreas K. Huettel (27 May 2017) # In the 17.0 profiles we assume that our system compiler uses C++14 # or later as default language setting. This means it has to be at # least GCC 6. If you need an older compiler for specific purposes, # feel free to unmask it, however, using it for normal emerging of # packages is neither recommended nor supported in any way. =sys-devel/gcc-4.9.4 For me it is unclear, whether I should unmask or mask these compilers. So I added them to /etc/portage/package.mask/. ,restarted the whole thing only to get the same message. So...from the logical point of view unmasking would be the correct way....but we are all urged to >gcc-6.4.0 ... so unmasking would be wrong...also from a logical point of view. Cheers Meino