public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tuxic@posteo.de
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 04:26:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171203032655.tg6xodvlb3i5xpm3@solfire> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73314087-5fa1-d75f-8a2e-a74857026f9c@gentoo.org>

On 12/02 09:30, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 09:15 PM, tuxic@posteo.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the instruction of the news item about the swicth to profile 17 says
> > that one needs to rebuild @world.
> > 
> > Is this technically needed?
> 
> Yes, unless you were already using a hardened toolchain.
> 
> 
> > Would it be possible to do this on base of the daily updates intead
> > all in one go?
> 
> No, you'll get build failures trying to link new packages against old
> libraries.
> 
> However, you can delay switching to the new profile for a while.
> 

Delaying would not solve the problem as it is...

If the compilation will fail at a certain point (and it will fail,
since this is a complete new thing) -- would it be possible to resume
even some tweaks, hacks and patches (even certain recompilations)
would be needed in between?

Can I stop a running emerge @world and resume later?

How does a restarted emerge @world recognizes packages, which are
already compiled according to the new standard?

Cheers
Meino




  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-03  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-03  2:15 [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically? tuxic
2017-12-03  2:30 ` Michael Orlitzky
2017-12-03  2:32   ` Adam Carter
2017-12-03  2:44     ` Michael Orlitzky
2017-12-03  3:26   ` tuxic [this message]
2017-12-03  3:35     ` Heiko Baums
2017-12-03  3:45       ` tuxic
2017-12-03  4:15         ` Heiko Baums
2017-12-03  9:53           ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-03 11:56             ` Heiko Baums
2017-12-03 12:55               ` Dale
2017-12-03 14:09                 ` Spackman, Chris
2017-12-03 14:16                   ` tuxic
2017-12-03 14:39                     ` Heiko Baums
2017-12-03 15:25                       ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-03 15:57                       ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-03 14:36                   ` Heiko Baums
2017-12-03 14:27                 ` Heiko Baums
2017-12-04  1:08                   ` Dale
2017-12-04  1:18                     ` Heiko Baums
2017-12-04  1:48                       ` Walter Dnes
2017-12-03  5:26         ` Adam Carter
2017-12-03 10:51         ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-03  3:47     ` Heiko Baums
2017-12-06 23:59     ` Frank Steinmetzger
2017-12-07  8:08       ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-04 17:48   ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2017-12-04 20:21     ` Michael Orlitzky
2017-12-05  9:16       ` Stefan G. Weichinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171203032655.tg6xodvlb3i5xpm3@solfire \
    --to=tuxic@posteo.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox