From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6A4D139083 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 550E6E0EA8; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF4DE0DA4 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eIMLu-0000fo-UV for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:21:42 +0000 Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 703CB66729 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:21:42 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:21:36 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Just when is portage/bashrc sourced? Message-ID: <20171124222136.6efc2eef@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20171124170724.5ooyzeswqdbxlpzn@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20171124011237.27jausp5fmhrr424@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20171124083234.2ca43b87@digimed.co.uk> <20171124170724.5ooyzeswqdbxlpzn@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/+YAmj8JmKQ06vGFT42Dtgc1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-smarthost03a-IP: [82.69.83.178] Feedback-ID: 82.69.83.178 X-Archives-Salt: 494c105f-203c-4f34-aa40-beca7afa2995 X-Archives-Hash: 00c809f9438725eb6e9a208b5a335b61 --Sig_/+YAmj8JmKQ06vGFT42Dtgc1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:07:24 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > You do have a choice, use /etc/portage/env. here's one I have to patch > > a specific version of a package > >=20 > > % cat env/app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3 > > post_src_unpack() { > > cd "${S}" > > epatch_user > > } =20 >=20 > Again IIRC, when I tried using env for a similar purpose, it didn't work > at all, it seemed the only things valid in those files were variable > assignments. Are you mixing portage/env up with portage/package.env? The latter loads conf files from env that contain variable assignments.=20 --=20 Neil Bothwick Excuse for the day: daemons did it --Sig_/+YAmj8JmKQ06vGFT42Dtgc1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE8k9T/rX16EJxEKG692eFu0QSMJgFAloYm3AACgkQ92eFu0QS MJisYBAAsIiTOw2AUAk6rnWdrgWP4oZWJGao8vtMbM7ODwBpb+GsyLEhs8W0Uk9Y NoeOYQ1xWPXo0KDc3CIWyuj+g0brHklMy4o1UZd4s18jzLPZV2YfzPcp7NPgBCa6 pUWD0OfipzbwUYfvR0T7GZwetrUHbW02YbhTSP2WI/SqqQdKp5AziycOaTq5QMzD 19lHG9xa5mTytyTBnOeACPpk81ryK8ZWe9GZ6nRTS6dJ/fjHCFa/hFwtCkFwyJLy pykw8MB/3EjZ5rUguIp12+HefVzT++TdOB4H0NMUWFU5D8c+PcyiW4VfLd2tqDuB rFit2TbxYe+QVKC88V/ahHFA/hTruEARSr2YbNgmO1ttbX6ieQOslVI2n9eDu7t3 r3pJwbLXTbcC1Qd38NtLB5viyPYEV63lq46DCD6rEHB2qGFDDang67Pymb5i+Ipy gNJrcf3ja30hIkJQ0/R0U4VB7qw7EBR1wicZe3bI6wgonYBkkGO+8V24Xi0C91Fo invBtc54YyQ55+hR5NqzQijxYUJspA1ofpjPZNfHicPujEqYu6Df5tLGxwM2vzin 2E2S7njOpAcqzQ8aDH1ImuSyiXbTIao3pNt2dWeLsds39dEikHi194ScAtinRXKJ MsmAiVSoU5QWEqT4SRk1c2ag9E5K1jcGmCoA40jTpEa7Mj5V0S8= =ztnC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+YAmj8JmKQ06vGFT42Dtgc1--