From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD1141396D9 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 02:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86465E0EA9; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 02:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1320E0E9B for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 02:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([79.223.109.11]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFdPZ-1eRTXM13DB-00EbFX for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 03:25:42 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 03:25:36 +0100 From: tuxic@posteo.de To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Help...can't decipher emerge oracle... Message-ID: <20171116022536.5sn7dlzcknyecmcj@solfire> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References:<20171115165037.ilmhoi7zwiltzwru@solfire> <20171115172011.eqyhm2xbtoz74byk@solfire> <20171115174315.6s3l23pgsvppqqf2@solfire> <20171115184050.09cd020a@digimed.co.uk> <20171116014905.gr7wqda5n55fyrws@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To:<20171116014905.gr7wqda5n55fyrws@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171027 Sender: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bAa1JJ4+lltOzMhIejFLEhQXr/1RiwwMtMuG8v6OlKcUoEjKrNX NBfqSYRyq5O34mjiLHBnpNAnTFD/JG3rSee2x8UVF9ER6Lu5O2+7BbEBngXBta8ERGjiIyQ NjHGGW70BMUMwwsvg0KuG47T7PZJvUMfVyD52xuvxUJlS3URXReW+aHe52elpcZ4jcWS1lo aiFXmc2GW4admbpJ8clSQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:/WcZmX4swX4=:6EGW1Gd/EsU0GP4Xym6SRW YbQX6Ggp2QHb3RrKmX3nHlZXiAbF8LPieKrgxvlL52MbOgbmUK9ReT6PEjant01kMRldbN1ap nGfY6rwPekDaHLZozQLuNGFkimPHXZpk63Ex1O11KF4zgazOSdX7DQVSz1qCnuxkTrzTHBieQ JH7DVHg6cR4htv0Nh+0M5IiYypWuPgBsguwv+9Wn6fJ4kplEu9QAdS1fKiUTrE7yn/fIArWnv GwPGzcuUei1sgyNWPO8GG68knKqZJyna39DR8I+EMWBe3kDGiSzUOaB8DAMJpUofqz5+W0n6V EoUE0DLChcTla4vtVe9vmHRPfXQ5fTVsIOjmLsFrDxFXQhmeInznTDN98KduI5cHWWy4Ct23V 4SgYYknkWX4Rcd1ut8uqv3+c/k1GQWF+oo6p6higLkyTmeE3w5SveXpya688J4+4GNKZBqXtm QPADnHPiAfOdzwVHOcUXsuzgNj3Oxbyr5T+Ts2/J2tEeTYgjEojDXdYKkpFAXWJyK/WCOowjv 4orhIPEetfndFOjhoqeiQhJk6P4+lhsM6J3X7o2i7u4EKz6LGKsQyqhosB53KKFhdDtuzODB5 WuHk3kN25J1ELeBW8MAmX30Z7vyjeoZ/IAA61alQnVyY/EnCDurWGm4qCPibsbO/PSU3hm3IW uK/tZsznQe9Y4FHLbN8xcqSXhRXW8tplzcfzweMk3vmDe92px8ei75fBJMi54mjnT/AqeR8Ge 1UZBYCUBSw9wEr8Bax91rWE+Vxo+rwW3hhVHSQKFn1vHQlB5x0Zocbd2D/5MpI2JR9BtmCgSt CtS7PCKh/1k/LkCQ0naDMR+9WrhGQ== X-Archives-Salt: 2b6fb35a-a353-4958-8bd4-cfa2af63615a X-Archives-Hash: 3fabf87e7b2da722e72b6c41e8fd9783 On 11/15 05:49, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2017-11-15 18:40, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > Why is it trying to install the 9999 version? Is that unmasked? > > > > Are you running stable or testing? > > > > What does "grep -r glibc /etc/portage" say? > > > > I don't think you posted the command that started all of this? > > For some reason, these horrible dependency dumps never seem to happen to > me. Why is that? Maybe because I run a "mostly stable" system? I do > have some very few "testing" packages enabled (ie. with ~amd64 flag). > They all fit into a single terminal screen. > > -- > Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, > if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. > To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain. > Hi Ian, I am happy to know, that your system is that stable and is not effected by problems other will find, report and get fixed by using the unstable version. ;) Cheers Meino