* [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? @ 2017-11-05 11:20 tuxic 2017-11-05 11:29 ` Tom H 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw To: Gentoo Hi, I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which has the extension "*.AppImage". What is that? Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? How to handle that? Thanks a lot for any help in advance! Cheers Meino ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? 2017-11-05 11:20 [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? tuxic @ 2017-11-05 11:29 ` Tom H 2017-11-05 12:11 ` tuxic 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom H @ 2017-11-05 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw To: Gentoo User On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: > > I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > has the extension "*.AppImage". > > What is that? > > Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > How to handle that? Does it use this spec? https://appimage.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? 2017-11-05 11:29 ` Tom H @ 2017-11-05 12:11 ` tuxic 2017-11-05 12:21 ` Tom H 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: > > > > I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > > has the extension "*.AppImage". > > > > What is that? > > > > Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > > How to handle that? > > Does it use this spec? > > https://appimage.org/ > Dont know... How can I unpack that to look into it? Cheers Meino ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? 2017-11-05 12:11 ` tuxic @ 2017-11-05 12:21 ` Tom H 2017-11-05 13:48 ` tuxic 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom H @ 2017-11-05 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw To: Gentoo User On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: > On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: >>> >>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which >>> has the extension "*.AppImage". >>> >>> What is that? >>> >>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? >>> How to handle that? >> >> Does it use this spec? >> >> https://appimage.org/ > > Dont know... > How can I unpack that to look into it? From https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage" etc... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? 2017-11-05 12:21 ` Tom H @ 2017-11-05 13:48 ` tuxic 2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: > > On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: > >>> > >>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > >>> has the extension "*.AppImage". > >>> > >>> What is that? > >>> > >>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > >>> How to handle that? > >> > >> Does it use this spec? > >> > >> https://appimage.org/ > > > > Dont know... > > How can I unpack that to look into it? > > From > https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit > > wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage" > etc... > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/. WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use AppStream metadata appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should be unpacked To be implemented unpacking is not implemented yet. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? 2017-11-05 13:48 ` tuxic @ 2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon 2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Alan McKinnon @ 2017-11-05 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 05/11/2017 15:48, tuxic@posteo.de wrote: > On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: >>> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: >>>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which >>>>> has the extension "*.AppImage". >>>>> >>>>> What is that? >>>>> >>>>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? >>>>> How to handle that? >>>> >>>> Does it use this spec? >>>> >>>> https://appimage.org/ >>> >>> Dont know... >>> How can I unpack that to look into it? >> >> From >> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit >> >> wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage" >> etc... >> > > > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/. > WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use AppStream metadata > appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should be unpacked > To be implemented > > unpacking is not implemented yet. Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. And yet they distribute using it. I would be questioning why I'm using that upstream's project at all, and find something better by an author with more clue. Am I missing something? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? 2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon @ 2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic 2017-11-05 15:20 ` [gentoo-user] How to crack open an *.AppImage Was: " tuxic 2017-11-05 15:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Rich Freeman 2017-11-05 16:01 ` Peter Humphrey 2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 11/05 04:46, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 05/11/2017 15:48, tuxic@posteo.de wrote: > > On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: > >>> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > >>>>> has the extension "*.AppImage". > >>>>> > >>>>> What is that? > >>>>> > >>>>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > >>>>> How to handle that? > >>>> > >>>> Does it use this spec? > >>>> > >>>> https://appimage.org/ > >>> > >>> Dont know... > >>> How can I unpack that to look into it? > >> > >> From > >> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit > >> > >> wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage" > >> etc... > >> > > > > > > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/. > > WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use AppStream metadata > > appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should be unpacked > > To be implemented > > > > unpacking is not implemented yet. > > > Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly > incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. > > And yet they distribute using it. > > I would be questioning why I'm using that upstream's project at all, and > find something better by an author with more clue. > > Am I missing something? > > > -- > Alan McKinnon > alan.mckinnon@gmail.com > > As so often, the persons 'up' in the hierarch decide things the people 'down' the hierarchy would keep their fingers off - but they will not be asked. I am 'down' the hierarchy and want to unpack that archive/image/whatever. Currently I am recompiling my kernel to support squashfs as it seems that this image is one of that images. If so, mounting it as an image and copying the files out of the mountpoints directory may work. Fingers crossed... Cheers Meino ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] How to crack open an *.AppImage Was: [OT] AppImage? What's that? 2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic @ 2017-11-05 15:20 ` tuxic 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 11/05 04:04, tuxic@posteo.de wrote: > On 11/05 04:46, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 05/11/2017 15:48, tuxic@posteo.de wrote: > > > On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote: > > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: > > >>> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote: > > >>>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which > > >>>>> has the extension "*.AppImage". > > >>>>> > > >>>>> What is that? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common? > > >>>>> How to handle that? > > >>>> > > >>>> Does it use this spec? > > >>>> > > >>>> https://appimage.org/ > > >>> > > >>> Dont know... > > >>> How can I unpack that to look into it? > > >> > > >> From > > >> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit > > >> > > >> wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage" > > >> etc... > > >> > > > > > > > > > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/. > > > WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use AppStream metadata > > > appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should be unpacked > > > To be implemented > > > > > > unpacking is not implemented yet. > > > > > > Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly > > incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. > > > > And yet they distribute using it. > > > > I would be questioning why I'm using that upstream's project at all, and > > find something better by an author with more clue. > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > > > -- > > Alan McKinnon > > alan.mckinnon@gmail.com > > > > > > As so often, the persons 'up' in the hierarch decide things the people > 'down' the hierarchy would keep their fingers off - but they will not > be asked. > > I am 'down' the hierarchy and want to unpack that > archive/image/whatever. > > Currently I am recompiling my kernel to support squashfs as it seems > that this image is one of that images. > If so, mounting it as an image and copying the files out of the > mountpoints directory may work. > > Fingers crossed... > > Cheers > Meino > > OK, I have found a way -- for all hesitating with this closed-opensource AppImage-blobs: chmod file.AppImage ./file.AppImage # wait ... mount # find mount point of this sealed bag,,,mine was /tmp/.mount-someting cp -a /tmp/.mount-something ~/somesaveplace <quit the application started by file.AppImage here> That's it. Happy tinkering! Cheers Meino ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? 2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon 2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic @ 2017-11-05 15:17 ` Rich Freeman 2017-11-05 16:01 ` Peter Humphrey 2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Rich Freeman @ 2017-11-05 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/11/2017 15:48, tuxic@posteo.de wrote: >> >> unpacking is not implemented yet. > > > Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly > incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. > > And yet they distribute using it. > Nah, they just don't consider extracting the stuff without running it important. Nor apparently do they consider it important to support the 0.1% of Linux users on a distro that doesn't support appimage (just a rough estimate based by all the logos on their webpage - I can't vouch for how well it works on the distros they list). The concept behind it isn't terrible, but if you want to use it your first step is to get it packaged/working on Gentoo. I don't see any reason that this couldn't be done - it just probably doesn't scratch many Gentoo user's itches. -- Rich ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? 2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon 2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic 2017-11-05 15:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Rich Freeman @ 2017-11-05 16:01 ` Peter Humphrey 2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Peter Humphrey @ 2017-11-05 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 16:46:07 +0200 > Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly > incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch. What, like KDE-4, KDE-plasma, ... ? -- Regards, Peter. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-05 16:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-11-05 11:20 [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? tuxic 2017-11-05 11:29 ` Tom H 2017-11-05 12:11 ` tuxic 2017-11-05 12:21 ` Tom H 2017-11-05 13:48 ` tuxic 2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon 2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic 2017-11-05 15:20 ` [gentoo-user] How to crack open an *.AppImage Was: " tuxic 2017-11-05 15:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Rich Freeman 2017-11-05 16:01 ` Peter Humphrey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox