* [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
@ 2017-11-05 11:20 tuxic
2017-11-05 11:29 ` Tom H
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo
Hi,
I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which
has the extension "*.AppImage".
What is that?
Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common?
How to handle that?
Thanks a lot for any help in advance!
Cheers
Meino
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
2017-11-05 11:20 [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? tuxic
@ 2017-11-05 11:29 ` Tom H
2017-11-05 12:11 ` tuxic
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tom H @ 2017-11-05 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo User
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
>
> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which
> has the extension "*.AppImage".
>
> What is that?
>
> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common?
> How to handle that?
Does it use this spec?
https://appimage.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
2017-11-05 11:29 ` Tom H
@ 2017-11-05 12:11 ` tuxic
2017-11-05 12:21 ` Tom H
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
> >
> > I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which
> > has the extension "*.AppImage".
> >
> > What is that?
> >
> > Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common?
> > How to handle that?
>
> Does it use this spec?
>
> https://appimage.org/
>
Dont know...
How can I unpack that to look into it?
Cheers
Meino
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
2017-11-05 12:11 ` tuxic
@ 2017-11-05 12:21 ` Tom H
2017-11-05 13:48 ` tuxic
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tom H @ 2017-11-05 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo User
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which
>>> has the extension "*.AppImage".
>>>
>>> What is that?
>>>
>>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common?
>>> How to handle that?
>>
>> Does it use this spec?
>>
>> https://appimage.org/
>
> Dont know...
> How can I unpack that to look into it?
From
https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit
wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage"
etc...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
2017-11-05 12:21 ` Tom H
@ 2017-11-05 13:48 ` tuxic
2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
> > On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which
> >>> has the extension "*.AppImage".
> >>>
> >>> What is that?
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common?
> >>> How to handle that?
> >>
> >> Does it use this spec?
> >>
> >> https://appimage.org/
> >
> > Dont know...
> > How can I unpack that to look into it?
>
> From
> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit
>
> wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage"
> etc...
>
./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/.
WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use AppStream metadata
appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should be unpacked
To be implemented
unpacking is not implemented yet.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
2017-11-05 13:48 ` tuxic
@ 2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2017-11-05 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 05/11/2017 15:48, tuxic@posteo.de wrote:
> On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
>>> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which
>>>>> has the extension "*.AppImage".
>>>>>
>>>>> What is that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common?
>>>>> How to handle that?
>>>>
>>>> Does it use this spec?
>>>>
>>>> https://appimage.org/
>>>
>>> Dont know...
>>> How can I unpack that to look into it?
>>
>> From
>> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit
>>
>> wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage"
>> etc...
>>
>
>
> ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/.
> WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use AppStream metadata
> appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should be unpacked
> To be implemented
>
> unpacking is not implemented yet.
Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly
incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch.
And yet they distribute using it.
I would be questioning why I'm using that upstream's project at all, and
find something better by an author with more clue.
Am I missing something?
--
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon
@ 2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic
2017-11-05 15:20 ` [gentoo-user] How to crack open an *.AppImage Was: " tuxic
2017-11-05 15:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Rich Freeman
2017-11-05 16:01 ` Peter Humphrey
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/05 04:46, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 05/11/2017 15:48, tuxic@posteo.de wrote:
> > On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
> >>> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which
> >>>>> has the extension "*.AppImage".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What is that?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common?
> >>>>> How to handle that?
> >>>>
> >>>> Does it use this spec?
> >>>>
> >>>> https://appimage.org/
> >>>
> >>> Dont know...
> >>> How can I unpack that to look into it?
> >>
> >> From
> >> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit
> >>
> >> wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage"
> >> etc...
> >>
> >
> >
> > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/.
> > WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use AppStream metadata
> > appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should be unpacked
> > To be implemented
> >
> > unpacking is not implemented yet.
>
>
> Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly
> incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch.
>
> And yet they distribute using it.
>
> I would be questioning why I'm using that upstream's project at all, and
> find something better by an author with more clue.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
>
> --
> Alan McKinnon
> alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
>
>
As so often, the persons 'up' in the hierarch decide things the people
'down' the hierarchy would keep their fingers off - but they will not
be asked.
I am 'down' the hierarchy and want to unpack that
archive/image/whatever.
Currently I am recompiling my kernel to support squashfs as it seems
that this image is one of that images.
If so, mounting it as an image and copying the files out of the
mountpoints directory may work.
Fingers crossed...
Cheers
Meino
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic
@ 2017-11-05 15:17 ` Rich Freeman
2017-11-05 16:01 ` Peter Humphrey
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rich Freeman @ 2017-11-05 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/11/2017 15:48, tuxic@posteo.de wrote:
>>
>> unpacking is not implemented yet.
>
>
> Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly
> incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch.
>
> And yet they distribute using it.
>
Nah, they just don't consider extracting the stuff without running it
important. Nor apparently do they consider it important to support
the 0.1% of Linux users on a distro that doesn't support appimage
(just a rough estimate based by all the logos on their webpage - I
can't vouch for how well it works on the distros they list).
The concept behind it isn't terrible, but if you want to use it your
first step is to get it packaged/working on Gentoo. I don't see any
reason that this couldn't be done - it just probably doesn't scratch
many Gentoo user's itches.
--
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] How to crack open an *.AppImage Was: [OT] AppImage? What's that?
2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic
@ 2017-11-05 15:20 ` tuxic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tuxic @ 2017-11-05 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/05 04:04, tuxic@posteo.de wrote:
> On 11/05 04:46, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 05/11/2017 15:48, tuxic@posteo.de wrote:
> > > On 11/05 07:21, Tom H wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:11 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
> > >>> On 11/05 06:29, Tom H wrote:
> > >>>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:20 AM, <tuxic@posteo.de> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I got an archive (???) of an Linux application, which
> > >>>>> has the extension "*.AppImage".
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> What is that?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Is it possible to "unpack" that into something more common?
> > >>>>> How to handle that?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Does it use this spec?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://appimage.org/
> > >>>
> > >>> Dont know...
> > >>> How can I unpack that to look into it?
> > >>
> > >> From
> > >> https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit
> > >>
> > >> wget "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/releases/download/continuous/appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage"
> > >> etc...
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ./appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage TestApp/.
> > > WARNING: appstreamcli is missing, please install it if you want to use AppStream metadata
> > > appimagetool-x86_64.AppImage is a file, assuming it is an AppImage and should be unpacked
> > > To be implemented
> > >
> > > unpacking is not implemented yet.
> >
> >
> > Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly
> > incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch.
> >
> > And yet they distribute using it.
> >
> > I would be questioning why I'm using that upstream's project at all, and
> > find something better by an author with more clue.
> >
> > Am I missing something?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alan McKinnon
> > alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
> >
> >
>
> As so often, the persons 'up' in the hierarch decide things the people
> 'down' the hierarchy would keep their fingers off - but they will not
> be asked.
>
> I am 'down' the hierarchy and want to unpack that
> archive/image/whatever.
>
> Currently I am recompiling my kernel to support squashfs as it seems
> that this image is one of that images.
> If so, mounting it as an image and copying the files out of the
> mountpoints directory may work.
>
> Fingers crossed...
>
> Cheers
> Meino
>
>
OK, I have found a way -- for all hesitating with this
closed-opensource AppImage-blobs:
chmod file.AppImage
./file.AppImage # wait ...
mount # find mount point of this sealed bag,,,mine was /tmp/.mount-someting
cp -a /tmp/.mount-something ~/somesaveplace
<quit the application started by file.AppImage here>
That's it.
Happy tinkering!
Cheers
Meino
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that?
2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic
2017-11-05 15:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Rich Freeman
@ 2017-11-05 16:01 ` Peter Humphrey
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Peter Humphrey @ 2017-11-05 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 16:46:07 +0200
> Reading only this thread, it looks like an upstream used a horribly
> incomplete scheme for distribution that isn't even ready for launch.
What, like KDE-4, KDE-plasma, ... ?
--
Regards,
Peter.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-05 16:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-05 11:20 [gentoo-user] [OT] AppImage? What's that? tuxic
2017-11-05 11:29 ` Tom H
2017-11-05 12:11 ` tuxic
2017-11-05 12:21 ` Tom H
2017-11-05 13:48 ` tuxic
2017-11-05 14:46 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-11-05 15:04 ` tuxic
2017-11-05 15:20 ` [gentoo-user] How to crack open an *.AppImage Was: " tuxic
2017-11-05 15:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Rich Freeman
2017-11-05 16:01 ` Peter Humphrey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox