From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0503E1396D9 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0CF7E0EA0; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45EAAE0849 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.prhnet) by smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1e9tML-0008JM-DL for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:47:09 +0000 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:47:09 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Alternatives to knutclient Message-ID: <20171101134709.5f126a41@peak.prhnet> In-Reply-To: <59F9C201.6090203@youngman.org.uk> References: <1922379.ZbMImBqxyj@dell_xps> <924d1b49-16ef-52ce-57c2-5f6e838cbf8d@gmail.com> <<924d1b49-16ef-52ce-57c2-5f6e838cbf8d@gmail.com> <20171030091007.03b2076d@peak.prhnet> <<20171030091007.03b2076d@peak.prhnet> <71878972.4tTIccPE0R@dell_xps> <<71878972.4tTIccPE0R@dell_xps> <514fb8df-3d93-7368-963b-41dcb08762ce@gmail.com> <<514fb8df-3d93-7368-963b-41dcb08762ce@gmail.com> <2704889.g4SM65V9YC@dell_xps> <<2704889.g4SM65V9YC@dell_xps> < < < <11705523.yOAOuWsGJo@dell_xps> <59F8B401.2050503@youngman.org.uk> <20171031232958.18a7cefa@peak.prhnet> <59F9C201.6090203@youngman.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-smarthost03a-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 152cd8b7-08dd-4105-8265-35e34a0caa3f X-Archives-Hash: 421b9e7cdca06874ed54e3cb4609a44d On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:45:53 +0000 > You would have thought it was easy to take a spur off of a socket that's > part of a ring main, It used to be easy enough - provided that the spur had no more than two single sockets or one double. Maybe the regs have changed yet again. > but believe me, as an amateur sparky it's NOT! They > sell special points - often with a switch - to take a feed off a ring, > and they all have a - mandatory - 16Amp fuse. Or they might take a > standard 13Amp fuse. I've never seen anything like that, but then I've been retired for 29 years. Come to think of it, that's long enough to include several changes of the regs. One wonders just where it's all going to end. -- Regards, Peter.