public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Zimmerman <itz@very.loosely.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Changing dependencies without upping version ??
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:17:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170924221756.wrcujwqkyloxehx4@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170924210502.3b108cac@digimed.co.uk>

On 2017-09-24 21:05, Neil Bothwick wrote:

> If the change doesn't affect the installed code, it is encouraged to
> avoid unnecessary rebuilding.
> 
> For example, a new version of LibreOffice or Chromium depends on
> libfoo, but the dev doesn't notice and already has libfoo installed so
> it works for him. You also have it installed so the upgrade works for
> you, then it fails for me and I file a bug report. If the dev
> revbumped the ebuild, you would have to spend a couple of hours
> rebuilding Chromium to get exactly the same code you had before. By
> not revbumping it, he fixes the problem for me without inconveniencing
> you.

I see, but of course in this case the effect would be exactly the
opposite - forcing me to rebuild the core qt packages and everything
that depends on them.  And if this was not a mistake, it must have been
clear that would happen.

It feels like a sneaky way to finally get the few remaining qt4 stragglers
out of the way.

-- 
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
Do obvious transformation on domain to reply privately _only_ on Usenet.


  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-24 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-24 17:37 [gentoo-user] Changing dependencies without upping version ?? Ian Zimmerman
2017-09-24 18:51 ` John Blinka
2017-09-25  0:33   ` Rich Freeman
2017-09-25  8:20     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-09-25  7:32   ` Paul Colquhoun
2017-09-24 20:05 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-09-24 22:17   ` Ian Zimmerman [this message]
2017-09-25 12:24 ` [gentoo-user] " Michael Palimaka
2017-09-25 17:03   ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-09-26 12:01     ` Michael Palimaka
2017-09-26 18:45       ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-09-27  0:38         ` Kai Krakow
2017-09-27  1:30           ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-09-27  1:35             ` Kai Krakow
2017-09-27  8:42             ` Neil Bothwick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170924221756.wrcujwqkyloxehx4@matica.foolinux.mooo.com \
    --to=itz@very.loosely.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox