From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261B51395E2 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBC41E0BFD; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.20]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A48CE0BE0 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cBdvL-0004iE-Ki for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:37:59 +0000 Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9FA2A619FE5 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:37:58 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:37:56 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USE flag question (not total newbie) Message-ID: <20161129083756.3e860e0d@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20161129045413.14401.353B15DE@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20161129012827.14326.2F5C2D91@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <46F51B34-DE12-43DC-BFEF-50E19885EC6B@antarean.org> <20161129045413.14401.353B15DE@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/+V_jvd_hW1mer_8qUuIRhIl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-smarthost03a-IP: [82.69.83.178] Feedback-ID: 82.69.83.178 X-Archives-Salt: 32d6c042-e95f-40a0-ace0-71d925effded X-Archives-Hash: f1af82f023f312be29652b0cccde6701 --Sig_/+V_jvd_hW1mer_8qUuIRhIl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:59:30 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I'll consider switching to qt5 when I can rebuild _all_ my packages that > way. Under no circumstances will I install both qt4 and qt5, that is a > recipe for madness. qt4 and qt5 are slotted and intended to be installed together. Packages are updated at different rates and you will reach a point where some packages haven't be updated for qt4 while others have dropped it entirely. The only way to completely avoid this situation is to have at most one package using qt installed. --=20 Neil Bothwick Eagles may soar, but Wombles don't get sucked into jet engines --Sig_/+V_jvd_hW1mer_8qUuIRhIl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQRyYA8zl+wvHnZn/je6bhqXQ3UZAwUCWD0+ZAAKCRC6bhqXQ3UZ A4l5AKC0lNUzCFqLJKRivuOnwYKq36kFnwCgiYkd8t/JDdpCj5YsBALWPutVplw= =cCZq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+V_jvd_hW1mer_8qUuIRhIl--