From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-174163-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747901395E2 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F902E0C3F; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F843E0B81 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>) id 1c8X2I-0000rc-PF for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:40:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com> Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion? Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:40:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20161120194015.3a3bc7fc@jupiter.sol.kaishome.de> References: <CAKpSnpKRQ1Dtiaw5fj+t7eG+xbaDsVuAr2_cqitb5KD2Kz2YYA@mail.gmail.com> <20161114213743.55a5e76a@jupiter.sol.kaishome.de> <CAKpSnpKJXE8VZ8ThPKBw=UL1gCYPcnmP2gKU=tjSdVmDAk-VUw@mail.gmail.com> <20161116124726.GA8424@g0n.xdwgrp> <CAOdo=Swzcjdih+=0hvKe8qV8nK-USHJm_og-R2roAWn5haoG6w@mail.gmail.com> <CAGfcS_mO36YvGC9vb0QaH00dgE8x0-wS_+tAPA3EvxUWm3QEoQ@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 4d1d6f19-7200-4320-ae29-540467308efc X-Archives-Hash: aa3436c650f0ef51e9b583fa07fcca85 Am Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:15:27 -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis > > <miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr> wrote: > >> > >> Ah, I almost forgot. Gentoo is as default (OpenRC) without dbus! > >> Have a look: > >> > >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems > >> > >> There is no D-Bus under "Main dependencies" for OpenRC (I really > >> like OpenRC...) > > > > There's no reason that the fact that OpenRC doesn't depend on dbus > > should imply that something higher up the stack cannot depend on > > dbus! > > I'd also comment that utilizing dbus and spawning random processes > that you don't understand are orthogonal issues. Dbus is just an IPC > mechanism. It's actually not dbus' fault that at-spi2 is launched... It's just a side-effect of at-spi2 being an IPC built ontop of dbus. What I don't like is that at-spi2 launches it's own dbus instance. Why not just join the bus that's already there? -- Regards, Kai Replies to list-only preferred.