From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 875091395E2 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CC8C21C06C; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr (rev-140-133.legacytubes.illyse.net [89.234.140.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44C0621C028 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647954EA72E for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:51:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swordarmor.fr; s=default; t=1479127874; bh=8IjTwsDihYCepKKicc/XVN5W8IZ3C3uZv4pWpwrFmP8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=A7X+0DXlTKta6mbKf+DDRhraAJmJbU9UagKezPGS336LXpRtl9pJXmOPfTc+PN1H/ pEI3paXAP98oyJVlk3TD+pjRKefMSOLMaCyLlb4nL/KhnUWAza+YHOV+GN0/eslJh5 UjeP0xtBY6lC431dlS2378E8X+aPsazatIxbtp6M= Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:51:13 +0100 From: Alarig Le Lay To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SMTP Relay Message-ID: <20161114125113.GP466@bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr> References: <04AEC939-0265-4469-9CB2-E3591BEE60DB@antarean.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LfQcPIWFRhGivmDw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr X-Archives-Salt: 0f5fd6bd-ccfc-4fa6-ab44-6afa2400a202 X-Archives-Hash: 9cdaa4b0f5a570e88c83a2868a718b36 --LfQcPIWFRhGivmDw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon Nov 14 12:16:01 2016, Auto Protection Info wrote: > You explained it all Rich, thanks. I'm not using it for spam, the idea was > to make it easier for me to contact all my students at a time, so I think > this is not considered as spamming, but anyway, I'll check for Amazon > service see if it can do the job correctly and easily. The problem is not you, the problem is everybody that uses this relay. The reputation id made on IP or ranges, not on a particular sender. eg. https://www.senderbase.org/lookup/?searchBy=3Dipaddress&searchString=3D= 89.234.186.24 --=20 alarig --LfQcPIWFRhGivmDw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYKbM9AAoJEK84SsFrICuIfBcIAJDb7t//y594IRJiZTZ+zEot AfweVKSv4VYPJKMNM3ftH2H5xrkOOoFXlXlUMme/4Ibtxu5h9VFBIw50y0R1vrqH jC2+j3OzIAUAckfUtyetwE6YyMz7PN9dku2hZaZnHfV+s4Djlv9uahdEFc7weVaX l7i3eMwOjFoIZ0duwM/y4SFL6t/KuuWhFa+WQSaS0zE5ttR5KKzCUmx8yw0dCqvx R/rhpE7r3f4+32ZKLRXcoUzU+39UdIq0MHXxG5+tF5rZXCxuybYmGW3HWoJd5JBK EoKwsx3C21Y+A2rqdhRRqoepy+klmSnRWGOhetVxFDfroGJo5PsYe0KULaYtFxo= =xm1n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LfQcPIWFRhGivmDw--