From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0231C138D47 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DA29E083C; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr (rev-140-133.legacytubes.illyse.net [89.234.140.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36636E07D2 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01FB4E9CEE for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:27:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swordarmor.fr; s=default; t=1477340863; bh=HRZYWDMVyZ7iOGcqsPT6Qd6MLWHT/EFzx3Gxb3MRpi0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=my4vfo+Kjo9Wcu5PQAK9nA3Q5uIMCHvvR+OsvWHwS3UruPxpPVBU97aium+QeT3AV BHJYf1A3WzFzTkQhiCWjfJo0Kss0yiApMTHOLzbKa5MWN5auggNFSWSylYVXZ4qNUs 5BqFLWEvO934Y44amF1DhW1aYKAQGRHX0lVdy0Lg= Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:27:42 +0200 From: Alarig Le Lay To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync Message-ID: <20161024202742.GF16625@bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr> References: <20161024180215.GD16625@bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HFNNDGBA8bk+zEXz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on bulbizarre.swordarmor.fr X-Archives-Salt: 9fd5c441-b892-4104-9d62-9d54aa1932db X-Archives-Hash: 8f8e7f4f705c691d2761786517ca4ea5 --HFNNDGBA8bk+zEXz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon Oct 24 15:49:09 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: > Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think > that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not > storing files twice. Because I have several host boxes and I build the packages on only one. --=20 alarig --HFNNDGBA8bk+zEXz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYDm6+AAoJEK84SsFrICuI9S0IALKdH9/n0/gqstcTyJe9S8Ho Xcw2wkLbMfZ9+9pukNDx+oEIxk6abWU2wWNqkwNBQsFrLJ8ld342DDumD5hFkboK q6tqWxMNcGke41NrkEIGBcAk+7PpEuBMyV0P3rVqYDV8Cu8IG8XuU7ils3Cw+L1r e98fQJEwJJMZyNd10qXkyf2q+1S1ae1zSRNgrEdwdOozHZ5YJnjzQfMoZ/3nYEDK pHHd0Rg8RIb/TiP7e4VX4gfD0Ew+Y0un/DQcovhZj/8cKLL3qzF7WjnUDX5/wgWU G72qW1CtCV9ybFQQA1pBljqaqTohlkQ4NDxkARJD4a+/CoZAStf2BsjNgG9cZJU= =XRNv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HFNNDGBA8bk+zEXz--