From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B691E138330 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 15:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79635E0BA8; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 15:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC010E0B91 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 15:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([79.223.105.26]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LwIuc-1aql760NqA-017ztz for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:51:38 +0200 Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 17:51:37 +0200 From: Meino.Cramer@gmx.de To: Gentoo Subject: [gentoo-user] Webkit-gtk yelp and dependencies Message-ID: <20161002155137.GD5024@solfire> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:/PwbqiOc2AyJahkd8tiIkfqGBEYOrakGa5ozjmThNC7NK0zHLm6 gZwelE7kMi8ScZbQx6+F0bn1ILxe2gAesRqJKi23OM1HQw3o0aZkYaFKUDaVhU0/doC7rkU tfM9MK436Tv0ZfOu3LLUW+jV6gw7ktxplq1Q10Mn2xIQFTtTyUlGpdBAuu1XQjUk10sOZ1a dn0Zl+ebhRQ/9NNxIpyIw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:WT1oqxtln8w=:GI1fXcfQpw14TMV6SkgBK5 6lYi9tUQZCd+nU3GAQbfc/6LM6MMb6TOAEdcu3olr8gqo7mFeNN4og0wRTaPWzEc1e4fAh+tt pBIYceeHKvpY0HDmjWKlHgX7/ZeVe8rXUTRQXdw/cyu7v1J/54XleqCTBTgUv0IUO7evbKXq6 YZsDf9e9kfdqay2P8SfHOoWK95wZ1XZtU02xmegcSHqCVKQ2AEFgL25bmqMcuU+W+cNww1WSu XVuubaZi8rWi/1stoZjMpgT8KQClAvEyRlkijQCcuDpxue0kwWn/9ZV3sI2KSMiDsfKPPDAml C7mq0kKE8Tineh/k8hhy7kLcGs7sullo+94cb/o6gh46trNIcSSZTxfmK76VZ7gN2J/JA5FA6 A3bGnzmea9GLQrRl4d4nKp6/vGKdk5h/gkiRAa7wCqW/gFXO7F9Cwhh1fFvMjKPyZQPkPAmb7 b0c9DZ2FcXqXjzui4wIrGcQo6j7zZGT8WCh2GBrC0uIs2f1xB9y2p7Wvcn1EHJk1X2FHvZiOj xo3NLDaOqd95RaPgjKNbOGC7xYw2z0aRkGHYdsn2sF8BTispey2EeFUpX9THJCxSQceFsNFrA Tltz0XhXEVhEO+I0b57sMOsn7qJpEQ+znhAzz2kLe+r07PyjyqFvllMFInHo/fnva/YvIDZoQ 5KEGRCv6vZTbBFXZ6mzA4UgguOttmyAsAWGa1VvSap43Jlb6nTW9Q2NOpNEIb1V8cr7bi0IFc xhxOXKh5JXQBJMu4jTHxisVOBDsKQSJ9BG+Geoz+A6PVQw80c+3kha73mbM= X-Archives-Salt: ba2fb3f0-1763-4445-8917-1c041d4b03f6 X-Archives-Hash: f970e63b92620c039fd050e4e957a7be Hi, this morning it happens again: net-libs/webkit-gtk was updated. For me it means: For a longer time as convenient full load on the all cores of the CPU of my GENTOO box, higher CPU temperatures as usual and laggy desktop. Hmmmmm... I did a emerge -cvp net-libs/webkit-gtk and got Calculating dependencies... done! net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.12.5 pulled in by: gnome-extra/yelp-3.20.1 requires >=net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.7.2:4 >>> No packages selected for removal by depclean Packages installed: 2088 Packages in world: 1099 Packages in system: 44 Required packages: 2088 Number to remove: 0 ...so only gnome-extra/yelp needs the webkit-gtk. I did a emerge -cvp gnome-extra/yelp and got Calculating dependencies... done! >>> Calculating removal order... >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged: gnome-extra/yelp selected: 3.20.1 protected: none omitted: none All selected packages: =gnome-extra/yelp-3.20.1 >>> 'Selected' packages are slated for removal. >>> 'Protected' and 'omitted' packages will not be removed. Packages installed: 2088 Packages in world: 1099 Packages in system: 44 Required packages: 2087 Number to remove: 1 ...which seems that nothing needs yelp. I myself use openbox and some gnome applications but no gnome desktop/sessions management etc. So it /seems/ that preventing recompilations of webkit-gtk is: Removing webkit-gtk and yelp. But I better ask before I get into the situation to be urged to recompile webkit-gtk...because I was wrong... Is the above ok or wrong or misleading or.... Thanks a lot for any help in advance! Cheers, Meino