From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C3C0138330 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 20:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 115C5E0B6A; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 20:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acedia.primate.net (disorder.primate.net [198.144.194.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39FDDE099D for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 20:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acedia.primate.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTPS id u8IKDQSP002340 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:13:31 -0700 Received: (from itz@localhost) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u8IKDMiB002329 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:13:22 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: acedia.primate.net: itz set sender to itz@primate.net using -f Received: from [10.8.78.14] (helo=matica.foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bliSm-0001yV-OS for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:13:20 -0700 Received: from itz by matica.foolinux.mooo.com with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bliSm-0006LG-JD for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:13:20 -0700 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:13:20 -0700 From: Ian Zimmerman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: gpg signature verification failures Message-ID: <20160918201109.24307.19720313@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20160918170101.6645.1B62394E@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <2637304.azccPCTbaF@dell_xps> <20160918184154.9472.11713EF6@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <1543516.AyAsJL8d1W@dell_xps> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1543516.AyAsJL8d1W@dell_xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Archives-Salt: bffe60c6-3d87-48ca-9dc5-2122c042ba17 X-Archives-Hash: 7a9f25533a110d3adffb20e3b16005d9 On 2016-09-18 12:32, Mick wrote: > > Your own message re: TaskCoach fails to verify, and that's what > > prompted me to post about it here. > > Failing to verify is not the same as bad signature. It may fail to > verify if the keyservers are unreachable by the client. This could be > because of traffic, DDoS attacks, etc. Sigh. Of course, I know the difference. Please s/fail to verify/BAD signature/ in all my messages in this thread. In particular, your message re: TaskCoach gives BAD signature. -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right?