From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD5D5138330 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DF61E0B27; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.7]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE5CE0B0D for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bfnkN-0007ay-6e for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:39:03 +0000 Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AC36753A2B7 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:39:02 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:38:57 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Is it still advisable to partition a big hard drive? Message-ID: <20160902133857.2e769a2c@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20160901095407.5d687e41@digimed.co.uk> <11891788.gD9ohsj6BR@serenity> <20160901184214.7905de4c@digimed.co.uk> <20160902115907.7540eba3@digimed.co.uk> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/HMB/vB4Hyji9Z+=Ip_4_.IE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-smarthost01d-IP: [82.69.83.178] Feedback-ID: 82.69.83.178 X-Archives-Salt: 29e30001-107b-445a-98ec-0e47e4052bf3 X-Archives-Hash: b63091c578ba37e6608714bf0841ef05 --Sig_/HMB/vB4Hyji9Z+=Ip_4_.IE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:48:17 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > > I use a script to handle my snapshots, so snapshotting multiple > > subvolumes is less of an issue, but an option to snapshot a subvolume > > and all its children, or even the whole filesystem, would be nice. > > =20 >=20 > Note that what I want is a snapshot that crosses subvolume boundaries, > so that it is atomic. Not a program that just iterates creating > individual snapshots that don't all happen at the exact same time. Yes, I get that. It would be a nice feature. --=20 Neil Bothwick If the bank returns your cheque marked "Insufficient Funds," call them and ask if they mean you or them. :-) --Sig_/HMB/vB4Hyji9Z+=Ip_4_.IE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlfJcuIACgkQum4al0N1GQOe0wCeNxEvSymA6v+9+STDDpCeCvmZ RAcAnRrmwiviSqVDuaI+rxCGednB2PxX =2xiL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/HMB/vB4Hyji9Z+=Ip_4_.IE--