From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA11C138330 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 02:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F20E421C06D; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 02:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D88CAE0B81 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 02:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfeNM-0003n5-V5 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:38:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: What's happened to gentoo-sources? Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:38:31 -0500 Organization: none Message-ID: <20160901213831.213dbada@sepulchrave.remarqs> References: <3719941.fjHdSEpZyq@peak> <3696924.CMMy0m93A0@peak> <20160830083455.739cc9a1@jupiter.sol.kaishome.de> <20160830084722.009963a1@digimed.co.uk> <20160901220819.7a1183df@jupiter.sol.kaishome.de> <20160901225631.20714da4@phoucgh.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 6960b2fd-fc28-4e77-9f85-ea49345431cd X-Archives-Hash: 10c2e794849df8f4894bbf1effe9d45b On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 22:56:31 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 22:08:19 +0200, Kai Krakow wrote: > > Removal of a 4.6 series ebuild also means there would follow no > > updates > > Are there any updates to the 4.6 series or was is 4.7 considered its > successor by the kernels devs? If the former, I can understand your > point. If the latter, there would be no updates so there is no point. The latter. The announcement of that is probably what prompted the tree-cleaning.