public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What's happened to gentoo-sources?
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:52:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160822135221.GE2571@acm.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4257290.qoQZgpyoJz@peak>

Hello, Peter.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 02:23:25PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 22 Aug 2016 11:19:07 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:12:59AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > After this morning's sync, both versions 4.4.6 and 4.6.4 of
> > > gentoo-sources have disappeared. Is this just finger trouble in the
> > > server chain? I get the same with UK and US sync servers.

> > I restrict myself (mostly) to stable releases, and there hasn't been one
> > for gentoo-sources for a very long time.

> Indeed, I've found the same on my stable systems.

> > The latest stable kernel I see (with $ eshowkw gentoo-sources) is 4.1.15-
> > r1, although 4.4.6 was stable and available at one stage  :-(.

> My x86 box is still running 4.4.6 because I don't want to plunge all the way 
> back to 4.1.45-r1. This box needs to be ~amd64 to get the latest NVMe and 
> amdgpu drivers.

I never did get around to configuring and building 4.4.6.  Maybe I
should.  But my box is now pushing 7 years old and seems built like a
tank (albeit one that needed a new power supply after just over a year).

I'm hoping that when the time comes, I'll still be able to buy a
motherboard that will allow Gentoo to be installed on it.  I can't see
myself doing that any time soon.  The only real reason to get a more
powerful machine would be to be able to build libreoffice in a sensible
amount of time.  If that were a priority, I could just upgrade to 16 GB
RAM and build LO in a ramdisk.

> -- 
> Rgds
> Peter

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-22 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-21  9:12 [gentoo-user] What's happened to gentoo-sources? Peter Humphrey
2016-08-21  9:55 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-21 10:20   ` Peter Humphrey
2016-08-21 11:28     ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-21 14:23       ` Peter Humphrey
2016-08-21 14:34         ` Alarig Le Lay
2016-08-21 14:50         ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-21 15:06           ` Peter Humphrey
2016-08-23  9:00           ` Tom H
2016-08-30  6:34       ` [gentoo-user] " Kai Krakow
2016-08-30  7:47         ` Neil Bothwick
2016-09-01 20:08           ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-01 20:57             ` Alan McKinnon
2016-09-01 21:56             ` Neil Bothwick
2016-09-02  0:33               ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-02  9:11                 ` Neil Bothwick
2016-09-02  2:38               ` »Q«
2016-09-01 20:14   ` Kai Krakow
2016-08-21 10:38 ` [gentoo-user] " Alarig Le Lay
2016-08-22 11:19 ` Alan Mackenzie
2016-08-22 13:23   ` Peter Humphrey
2016-08-22 13:52     ` Alan Mackenzie [this message]
2016-08-23  7:25 ` J. Roeleveld
2016-08-23  8:30   ` Peter Humphrey
2016-08-23  8:53     ` J. Roeleveld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160822135221.GE2571@acm.fritz.box \
    --to=acm@muc.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox