From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D351382FE for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3909121C10F; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cwt-smtp-11.totbb.com (cwt-smtp-11.totbb.com [118.175.47.77]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B05921C03E for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from opal.binro.org (node-tkt.pool-125-25.dynamic.totbb.net [125.25.149.189]) by cwt-smtp-11.totbb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB1C1D661 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:17:48 +0700 (ICT) Received: from opal.binro.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by opal.binro.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u6ADHlhe027436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:17:47 +0700 Received: (from robin@localhost) by opal.binro.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id u6ADHld0027433 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:17:47 +0700 From: Robin Atwood To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Update blocked by kdebase-startkde:4 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:17:46 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.3.3-gentoo; KDE/4.14.20; x86_64; ; ) References: <201607092052.46760.robin@binro.org> <2260081.eQf0LrpUZy@peak> <2616034.iRykjQo1re@peak> In-Reply-To: <2616034.iRykjQo1re@peak> X-Face: .c^^1Tm5bSr;@/t2T;-0HM`{~wj)F]2C]Zr#!Ig5fi&$LV1E^;5jL{]08F@tj{f3,U(I[9 ;7R4jB8A7|mw7{K\OYFzCL_e/tAb)0_@07[e.}H`OE*na@7m=Op1.s0v3_3*|?#l|XD}n* ARBV@IdaVd!V&bo;Z/TEb}oJi_(}3VOa^tj;$zlk96>K*hb>PYbe6J`'7qh`?m!!/k]ezl _VIifMR#4kg*"'n/S&^4@4: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_7rkgX/eUvMhGpWc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201607102017.47422.robin@binro.org> X-TOTBB-NET-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TOTBB-NET-MailScanner-ID: 5CB1C1D661.AD6EB X-TOTBB-NET-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TOTBB-NET-MailScanner-From: robin@binro.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: 1c72805c-4373-4167-afc8-713a1f0f6239 X-Archives-Hash: 1326ca10209de5643b5bf836cd835dd2 --Boundary-01=_7rkgX/eUvMhGpWc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sunday 10 July 2016, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 09 Jul 2016 23:22:49 I wrote: > > On Sunday 10 Jul 2016 04:08:36 Michael Palimaka wrote: > --->8 > > > > This change is correct - we're in the process of cleaning up some old > > > ebuilds at the moment. > > > > > > In this case kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta:5 doesn't imply anything > > > KF5-based - it has just been ported to use a newer eclass. It still > > > just pulls in the old KDE4-based kde-runtime packages. > > I don't think that's entirely true; see below. > > > That's good news. Now, how does one allow that package to be installed > > while keeping the rest of KF5 masked? > > > > # cat /etc/portage/package.mask > > kde-plasma/* > > kde-frameworks/*:5 > > kde-apps/*:5 > > kde-misc/*:5 > > > > >=kde-apps/kde4-l10n-16.04.1 > > > > We seem to need an analogue of CONFIG_PROTECT and CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, in > > which we could mask all kde-apps/*:5 while allowing > > kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta:5 to be installed. Can that be done? I hope > > there's an easier way than masking all 122 apps separately. > > In fact I tried the separate masking. It led on to having to treat > kde-plasma and kde-frameworks similarly, and before I knew it I was > unmasking a load of packages that don't belong in a KDE-4 system. > > What to try next? Indeed. The situation seems to be that Gentoo is not upgradable unless KDE5 is installed. :( Robin -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Robin Atwood. "Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst, Where there ain't no Ten Commandments an' a man can raise a thirst" from "Mandalay" by Rudyard Kipling ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary-01=_7rkgX/eUvMhGpWc Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sunday 10 July 2016, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> On Saturday 09 Jul 2016 23:22:49 I wrote:

> > On Sunday 10 Jul 2016 04:08:36 Michael Palimaka wrote:

> --->8

>

> > > This change is correct - we're in the process of cleaning up some old

> > > ebuilds at the moment.

> > >

> > > In this case kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta:5 doesn't imply anything

> > > KF5-based - it has just been ported to use a newer eclass. It still

> > > just pulls in the old KDE4-based kde-runtime packages.

>

> I don't think that's entirely true; see below.

>

> > That's good news. Now, how does one allow that package to be installed

> > while keeping the rest of KF5 masked?

> >

> > # cat /etc/portage/package.mask

> > kde-plasma/*

> > kde-frameworks/*:5

> > kde-apps/*:5

> > kde-misc/*:5

> >

> > >=kde-apps/kde4-l10n-16.04.1

> >

> > We seem to need an analogue of CONFIG_PROTECT and CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, in

> > which we could mask all kde-apps/*:5 while allowing

> > kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta:5 to be installed. Can that be done? I hope

> > there's an easier way than masking all 122 apps separately.

>

> In fact I tried the separate masking. It led on to having to treat

> kde-plasma and kde-frameworks similarly, and before I knew it I was

> unmasking a load of packages that don't belong in a KDE-4 system.

>

> What to try next?

 

Indeed. The situation seems to be that Gentoo is not upgradable unless KDE5 is installed. :(

 

Robin

 

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Robin Atwood.

 

"Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst,

Where there ain't no Ten Commandments an' a man can raise a thirst"

from "Mandalay" by Rudyard Kipling

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary-01=_7rkgX/eUvMhGpWc--