From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2A113826A for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F7B2234003; Tue, 24 May 2016 21:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1291121C012 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 21:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from archlinux.localdomain ([97.66.215.44]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MEccf-1bL3MC2Lzl-00Fo2N for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:29:50 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 16:29:27 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NumLock puzzle Message-ID: <20160524212927.GA502@archlinux.localdomain> References: <20160524110920.GA1306@ca.inter.net> <20160524155031.7a631637@hal9000.localdomain> <20160524172705.GA1307@ca.inter.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160524172705.GA1307@ca.inter.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ElYwoSZEPWe/sLwzgUUR4uVVYmXT79yoQDbKs+qVwufjzyiU4Tf V9JWEmays4pfVeVxmvA7w7ioutvcD/U41RGhzggO+K5MVFsSS41JvOIhTIYh/Pm8GKN7GBb 8gCWPRd+M6LCaXwtrQbOqo7MpB/RYMnuy5/w7hmNMKTC84A6TltTqWMsPR020vWfmz6Hdvn lMizjBPk3egai1BMw92aA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:eNbOrf4enE4=:tFagbjWqJhVIYrrm1UCv6T 0PiDNXCt4bIcnz6vgG8aq+4h4nxDnQBFNrNpofOez/c/aLGd+I1CiygLxUIZcluUjYz4CMTkW E/DAd+J3G+DWj2B0fRB98R1v3DjL8PzrIH1X6v+SwiYHRBgrd0qQqQ1vM14aRcOIjqanJOETe lZp20ZIamZQdyaICe354W6uSwOtKHAL8KyfPycuZXCxFfoMc/NyF18cv1RX1FZw3vi7XLyV3I LUER9usRHEIJ0leVsFExvZXRQnZAUqa3wXncKVLTtG3+jfKhIpIcnBGsbP+g7ETp0qqCly7oR wPo1ymg4TsIEpx5bJbpLHsnpA31P95iMRLjaQ0eMBzwjtOBIcV/lUc8YmoP+ZF02qjK2JjTqa FbPWbIUEDSss50HH9zrzDGRmnilpVidM8IgtmnF/ozU1d8mqYcgIqjCW0bccbVUMlDsl+4EKg 2a8hztEfDjz8VCsqPCspZIQ4dCB63ltmI/ZrbjPFmA9q/ZHIp+Sz4bdrR19A0uOYUHC7EVjBP IBsdshPOqRsB1C26Y3zdV/ro786fKaJ6lAa2/Rz6h8Q1QiygtME3BfK2YWAQ4zsyB3N0/fhRe 48JySwVQvGn0ayj0eJvzLM9PbrT6S7AdlI3J86L7BGnJPDFdQwPMWYBflHL/e1k8ndP/8Q+8M 2gKT8/fuAs9Lnzp8/7X3Y1nJfPt9KEKqalVDxhkra9f6+iBmd7P9dDPvOseh2vwT2evWgOb0r ZVhWJiitJDLZYeufcTmo7uJoNqCqoxrS6Botg5SvG0L/tRq1ZGebLZQKI45OYKMin27DrirYW bT5GQdZOFNs1gHuXa5zO0lqE8ygZQ== X-Archives-Salt: d5c24d27-d7dd-41d5-a848-cfec540d0bce X-Archives-Hash: 6c2a5f5088c6e628bdd2c64546f62206 On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:27:06PM -0400, Philip Webb wrote: > 160524 wabe wrote: > > Philip Webb wrote: > >> I've noticed that the NumLock key goes off after 'startx'. > >> My window manager is Fluxbox & I don't see any mention there > >> nor does there seem to be any setting under /etc/X11 . > >> I have added 'numlock' to the default runlevel, > >> but that makes no difference. > > I had the same "problem" under XFCE till I added to my .xinitrc > > 'xsetleds +num -caps -scroll' > > I tried that, inserting it before/after 'startfluxbox', > but it makes no difference. > 'xsetleds' has no man file & 'which xsetleds' yields nothing. > > Thanks for trying so far. Does anyone have further advice ? Sorry if I missed something in this thread, but could you confirm you have the x11-misc/numlockx package installed and have, as the last two lines in your .xinitrc: numlockx& exec fluxbox