From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCA1138222 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 08:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 066A621C1BF; Thu, 5 May 2016 08:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03c.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03c.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.22]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CB521C107 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 08:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost03c.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ayF5t-0003Ad-2O for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 08:57:13 +0000 Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 541D242010D for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:57:12 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 09:57:06 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set Message-ID: <20160505095706.3749c8ad@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <2012303.QlJmnTNPrp@peak> References: <5tdlz0G+MAFz6wRigFofx1@vEFKyqnGQidjFgt8glmD4> <2012303.QlJmnTNPrp@peak> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2-136-g44d6f5 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/1X/Uh50pC1R1RDRpg34LiEi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-smarthost03c-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: 472351ac-77a7-475e-aa16-fb5736e42e42 X-Archives-Hash: c4ca19291ef0af2d66b12a4cade31786 --Sig_/1X/Uh50pC1R1RDRpg34LiEi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 05 May 2016 09:53:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Also, grub is a total failure on this box: it just isn't detected. So I > use gummiboot instead. It's also far, far easier to manage if you have > more than one kernel to choose from, and it saves you having to learn > all that baroquery. Frankly, I'm glad to see the back of grub-2. I'd go so far to say that the main reason to use UEFI is to be free of GRUB. gummiboot/bootctl is so much nicer, even if it is now part of systemd's plans for World domination ;-) --=20 Neil Bothwick Women live longer than men because they have so many clothes that they wouldn't be caught dead in. --Sig_/1X/Uh50pC1R1RDRpg34LiEi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlcrCuIACgkQum4al0N1GQNtzgCgmRV8ici87TdQJFyBYAPa/xbx URIAn0PtWrhHqorMIEVfoUYQwgA9mFID =ffIX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1X/Uh50pC1R1RDRpg34LiEi--