From: Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE Plasma 5 moved to stable
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:10:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160414221002.GB22642@kern.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <neoo0i$6jq$1@ger.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1777 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:37:05AM +1000, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 11/04/16 20:34, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 April 2016 11:12:51 Mick wrote:
> >> I noticed today that Plasma 5 is now stable, which means I will soon have
> >> to deal with it.
> >
> > I saw that too, and it cast a gloom over the rest of my day. I intend to stick
> > with KDE-4 until some more sensible themes become available in Plasma 5, so I
> > hope someone will be keeping an archive of KDE-4 somewhere, as in the earlier
> > case of KDE 3 -> 4.
>
> While both Plasma 4 and even Qt 4 are end-of-life upstream, I don't
> think they're going anywhere quite yet. There's no pressing need to
> remove it yet, and there's still a long way to go in terms of porting in
> the Qt ecosystem in general.
>
> When it is eventually removed, I also don't see any reason why Qt 4 and
> KDE 4 can't go to the kde-sunset overlay along with 3.
What I loved about Gentoo in the olden days was that it was one of the very
few distros that still kept KDE3 in its normal repos for a long time, while
many other popular binary distros jumped on the band wagon as early as 4.1,
when it was barely usable and full of trivial bugs.
We even had the choice of installing both KDE3 and 4 at the same time. That
made transition far easier and it allowed me to get settled in due time. So
I'm not particularly worried about the next few months, especially with the
modularity and interchangeability of today's KDE components.
Thank you for that, devs and maintainers. Good night.
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any social network.
All pleasant things are either immoral, illegal or make you fat.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-09 10:12 [gentoo-user] KDE Plasma 5 moved to stable Mick
2016-04-09 15:35 ` Andrés Becerra Sandoval
2016-04-09 16:16 ` Marc Joliet
2016-04-09 21:42 ` Andrés Becerra Sandoval
2016-04-09 20:03 ` Neil Bothwick
2016-04-09 21:41 ` Mick
2016-04-09 22:08 ` Neil Bothwick
2016-04-10 7:09 ` Mick
2016-04-10 9:25 ` J. Roeleveld
2016-04-11 10:34 ` Peter Humphrey
2016-04-11 11:17 ` J. Roeleveld
2016-04-11 18:15 ` Mick
2016-04-11 20:34 ` Alan McKinnon
2016-04-11 20:52 ` Mick
2016-04-11 18:35 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2016-04-14 18:37 ` Michael Palimaka
2016-04-14 22:10 ` Frank Steinmetzger [this message]
2016-04-15 13:00 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2016-04-15 13:06 ` Alan McKinnon
2016-04-15 13:09 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2016-04-15 13:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2016-04-15 15:23 ` »Q«
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160414221002.GB22642@kern.fritz.box \
--to=warp_7@gmx.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox