[gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:

[gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:

[Valmor de Almeida]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 528 bytes --]

Hello,

I have done several

emerge --sync

today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
Any thoughts?

Thank you.

--
Valmor

>>> Fetching (165 of 221) media-libs/mesa-11.0.6::gentoo

!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/media-libs/mesa/mesa-9999.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: e2eb88ce00f4e8f37a940c982bfc7c38d5ed015477caa3397508792ca620968d
!!! Expected:
eb7a5581c6001e07d6a2a817f023cfd005ee45cda03cfca498e825bf3d3104a4

>>> Failed to emerge media-libs/mesa-11.0.6

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 687 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:

[Sam Jorna]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 602 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:52:20PM -0400, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>    Hello,
>    I have done several
>    emerge --sync
>    today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
>    Any thoughts?
>    Thank you.

This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware, was either
caused by bad timing between commits and rsync metadata generation or some other
factor in generating the metadata being pushed out to rsync servers; though from
what I've seen it seems to only affect some mirrors.

0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204

--
Sam Jorna (wraeth)
GnuPG Key: D6180C26

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 951 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[»Q«]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:26:07 +1000
Sam Jorna <wraeth@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:52:20PM -0400, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> >    Hello,
> >    I have done several
> >    emerge --sync
> >    today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
> >    Any thoughts?
> >    Thank you.  
> 
> This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware,
> was either caused by bad timing between commits and rsync metadata
> generation or some other factor in generating the metadata being
> pushed out to rsync servers; though from what I've seen it seems to
> only affect some mirrors.
> 
> 0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204

If anyone knows of a good rsync mirror, please post.  (This has hit me
in the middle of migration to plasma 5, perfect timing.)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[R0b0t1]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 62 bytes --]

Use webrsync or webrsync-gpg and see if the problem persists.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 79 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[Valmor de Almeida]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 267 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:14 PM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@gmail.com> wrote:

> Use webrsync or webrsync-gpg and see if the problem persists.
>

Waited for a few hours and tried both

  emerge --sync

and

 emerge-webrsync

still problematic.

Thanks for the replies.

--
Valmor

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 818 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[J. Roeleveld]

On April 8, 2016 4:15:04 AM GMT+02:00, Valmor de Almeida <val.gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:14 PM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Use webrsync or webrsync-gpg and see if the problem persists.
>>
>
>Waited for a few hours and tried both
>
>  emerge --sync
>
>and
>
> emerge-webrsync
>
>still problematic.
>
>Thanks for the replies.
>
>--
>Valmor

Try downloading a snapshot from the gentoo servers?

--
Joost 
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --]

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:56:34 -0500, »Q« wrote:

> > >    Hello,
> > >    I have done several
> > >    emerge --sync
> > >    today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
> > >    Any thoughts?
> > >    Thank you.    
> > 
> > This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware,
> > was either caused by bad timing between commits and rsync metadata
> > generation or some other factor in generating the metadata being
> > pushed out to rsync servers; though from what I've seen it seems to
> > only affect some mirrors.
> > 
> > 0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204  
> 
> If anyone knows of a good rsync mirror, please post.  (This has hit me
> in the middle of migration to plasma 5, perfect timing.)

I tried a few with no joy. As it appeared to be only the 9999 ebuild
causing the problem, I deleted the file and removed the corresponding
line from the Manifest.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Death to all fanatics!

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[»Q«]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:14:30 +0100
Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:56:34 -0500, »Q« wrote:

> > > 0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204    
> > 
> > If anyone knows of a good rsync mirror, please post.  (This has hit
> > me in the middle of migration to plasma 5, perfect timing.)  
> 
> I tried a few with no joy. As it appeared to be only the 9999 ebuild
> causing the problem, I deleted the file and removed the corresponding
> line from the Manifest.

I tried a few with no joy, too, and now I've done as you suggest.
Thanks for that -- I'd thought portage would complain if I did that.

The delay may have saved me a little bit of pain.  Before re-syncing
today, something I didn't understand was preventing okular being
rebuilt after switching to the desktop/plasma profile, but not now.

I'm one of the nuts who has USE="-*", and I've finally hit a situation
where it causes considerable headaches;  plasma 5 requires a lot of
per-package USE stuff, all handled in the profile thanks to careful
work from the devs.  Instead of trying to tackle it package-by-package,
for now I've just copied the profile's package.use to
my /etc/portage/package-use.  I think this will be too much for me to
maintain as plasma 5 and the profile change, so when I get some time
I'll be ditching USE="-*" in order to rely on the profile.  My fellow
USE="-*" loonies who will have to move to plasma 5 might want to
consider ditching USE="-*" first.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[Valmor de Almeida]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1217 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:56:34 -0500, »Q« wrote:
>
> > > >    Hello,
> > > >    I have done several
> > > >    emerge --sync
> > > >    today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
> > > >    Any thoughts?
> > > >    Thank you.
> > >
> > > This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware,
> > > was either caused by bad timing between commits and rsync metadata
> > > generation or some other factor in generating the metadata being
> > > pushed out to rsync servers; though from what I've seen it seems to
> > > only affect some mirrors.
> > >
> > > 0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204
> >
> > If anyone knows of a good rsync mirror, please post.  (This has hit me
> > in the middle of migration to plasma 5, perfect timing.)
>
> I tried a few with no joy. As it appeared to be only the 9999 ebuild
> causing the problem, I deleted the file and removed the corresponding
> line from the Manifest.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> Death to all fanatics!
>

At this time still a problem. Did what Neil suggested above; good to go and
moving forward.
Thanks,

--
Valmor

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1951 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1546 bytes --]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:03:05 -0500, »Q« wrote:
> > I tried a few with no joy. As it appeared to be only the 9999 ebuild
> > causing the problem, I deleted the file and removed the corresponding
> > line from the Manifest.  
> 
> I tried a few with no joy, too, and now I've done as you suggest.
> Thanks for that -- I'd thought portage would complain if I did that.

It complains if you add or remove files, but by removing both the file
and its reference n the Manifest, everything stays consistent. Whether
being able to do that is a convenience or a security risk is a matter of
preference, but until Manifests are signed it is doable.

> I'm one of the nuts who has USE="-*", and I've finally hit a situation
> where it causes considerable headaches;

It was only a matter of time...

>  plasma 5 requires a lot of
> per-package USE stuff, all handled in the profile thanks to careful
> work from the devs.  Instead of trying to tackle it package-by-package,
> for now I've just copied the profile's package.use to
> my /etc/portage/package-use.  I think this will be too much for me to
> maintain as plasma 5 and the profile change, so when I get some time
> I'll be ditching USE="-*" in order to rely on the profile.  My fellow
> USE="-*" loonies who will have to move to plasma 5 might want to
> consider ditching USE="-*" first.

So you're using the supplied wheels now instead of removing them and
trying to reinvent your own square ones now? ;-)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

It's not a bug, it's tradition!

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]