From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EEE1384B4 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 21:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD13021C131; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 21:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from caladan.c-14.de (caladan.c-14.de [78.47.48.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20F921C12C for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 21:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sardaukar.c-14.de (HSI-KBW-134-3-45-5.hsi14.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [134.3.45.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by caladan.c-14.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD14819C53F for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 21:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:02:36 +0100 From: Simon Thelen To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures Message-ID: <20151115210235.GA8427@anonymous> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20151112171903.68e1b944@hal9000.localdomain> <5644C238.6040008@gmail.com> <20151115095928.GA1766@acm.fritz.box> <20151115171735.4fd31dc3@digimed.co.uk> <5648E8C3.5090509@gmail.com> <1673.1447619387@ccs.covici.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1673.1447619387@ccs.covici.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Archives-Salt: e209a6c3-0a85-4cf1-a119-9fbbf37c257f X-Archives-Hash: b08b5d27180a75f48b09fb0d422c8b8c On 15-11-15 at 15:29, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Dale wrote: > > Martin Vaeth wrote: > > > Neil Bothwick wrote: [..] > > > As a temporary hack, calling "ebuild manifest" on that file is > > > probably the only reasonable way to proceed, but this problem > > > must be fixed, of course... > > Wasn't there a emerge option to ignore the manifest? I seem to recall > > there used to be one but it was a LONG time ago. Of course, if someone > > has tinkered with something that would be a bad thing to do. > I thought I remembered something where the manifest no longer checks the > ebuild, just the file in distfiles -- I thought I remembered seeing this > somewhere. It was at a time when we got all the manifests all at once. I sync from git and none of my Manifests track the ebuilds, so this could be a thing. Note how the Manifest for busybox in the gentoo.git tree doesn't have manifests for any of the ebuilds. [1] [1]: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sys-apps/busybox/Manifest -- Simon Thelen