From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37901384B4 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 01:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6534121C14E; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 01:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5050221C13E for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 01:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zy8le-0001r8-Jf for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 02:39:38 +0100 Received: from 64.69.39.66 ([64.69.39.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 02:39:38 +0100 Received: from w41ter by 64.69.39.66 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 02:39:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 17:39:29 -0800 Message-ID: <20151115173929.4f14ed80@a6> References: <20151112171903.68e1b944@hal9000.localdomain> <5644C238.6040008@gmail.com> <20151115095928.GA1766@acm.fritz.box> <20151115171735.4fd31dc3@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.69.39.66 X-Archives-Salt: f86c979d-9e82-4e3e-bbdb-a97bcf38976e X-Archives-Hash: 628adbb2e9f069e14a8afb0088272a43 On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Martin Vaeth wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > I deleted the busybox directory from the tree then ran emerge > > --sync. The error is still there > > You have the same files that I have. > Unfortunately, only now I actually did: > > $ grep busybox-9999 Manifest > EBUILD busybox-9999.ebuild 8580 [...] > > ??? > I have the same wrong size recorded in the Manifest! > No idea why portage didn't yell at me - there seems > to be another bug involved... I did the same thing today (15 Nov) and it succeeded. However, I ran the ebuild command on a non-broken ebuild. Try repeating the same command on busybox 1.23.x or 1.24.x I hope the gentoo devs will fix this bug before you have a chance to test my advice :)