From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D35B1384B4 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9259221C1A3; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.muc.de (mail.muc.de [193.149.48.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA9E21C193 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98075 invoked by uid 3782); 15 Nov 2015 10:59:55 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (p579E9760.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.158.151.96]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:59:54 +0100 Received: (qmail 2570 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Nov 2015 11:01:53 -0000 Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:01:53 +0000 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures Message-ID: <20151115110153.GD1766@acm.fritz.box> References: <20151112171903.68e1b944@hal9000.localdomain> <5644C238.6040008@gmail.com> <20151115095928.GA1766@acm.fritz.box> <2BE25BAB-1326-4F34-856D-DB87C08291BB@iki.fi> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2BE25BAB-1326-4F34-856D-DB87C08291BB@iki.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-Archives-Salt: 420dc836-12f4-416d-a23a-b306b94bb6b9 X-Archives-Hash: b9f8308c44e53be671bd5ac772f840a7 Hello, Matti On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:22:39PM +0200, Matti Nykyri wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2015, at 11:59, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:45:44PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> On 12/11/2015 18:42, Grant Edwards wrote: > >>>> On 2015-11-12, wrote: > >>>> Grant Edwards wrote: > >>>>> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my > >>>>> "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the Changelong files > >>>>> are broken for about 2/3 of the packages it wants to update: > > [ .... ] > >> The dev are doing some $MAGIC to reinstate ChangeLogs and the first run > >> is expected to take a while (i.e. several hours). I suppose you can > >> expect some breakage till it finishes. > >> It's being discussed and tracked on gentoo-dev, you can drop a mail > >> there with specifics to let the devs know what's happening. > > Three days later. I'm still getting this error message, but with a nasty > > twist in the tail. emerge -puND @world reports (amongst others) the > > following update: > > [ebuild R ] sys-apps/busybox-1.23.1-r1 USE="-pam*" > > , and the error message I get on actually trying to start the update is > > !!! Digest verification failed: > > !!! /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-9999.ebuild > > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > > !!! Got: 8493 > > !!! Expected: 8580 > > . Why is the build system looking at the digest for version 9999 when it > > should be rebuilding version 1.23.1-r1? > Well it's not. It just checks all the manifests and complains about > errors. It doesn't affect the building of 1.23.1-r1. Ah, OK. But it causes emerge to bail out, so never gets round to building 1.23.1-r1. > If I were you I'ld download the latest portage snapshot. That should > take care of any remaining issues. Is your portage upto date? I'd just synched my portage tree immediately before attempting the build. I'll try again tomorrow, in the hope everything will have been sorted out by then. > -- > -M -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).