On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:18:15 +0100, Ralf wrote:

> And thinking about btrfs snapshot feature, using some 'btrfs history
> tool', i would probably only be able to see a lot of crypto garbage when
> going through my history (which can for sure be accessed by ecryptfs,
> but not by standard btrfs tools).

That's a good point, you'd need to mount each snapshot before you could
read it.

I *really* wish btrfs had its own encryption, but I suspect this would be
far from trivia to implement.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.