From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78B91384B4 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CAEC21C03C; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA0321C014 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so34590686wmw.1 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 08:56:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=b240F9LeIIysxreFpaucKJUzzpuH/oGcYVm2RvuZdsc=; b=GRKgwM7IC6pFThAzYZXtf6DwNOcqT1oqn3H9mgkTVE8qyT8LsWR+i1KMgjvd6j/1fB TA9ZHsU4SMJHHnUdcfectd86QMPlei0Z62Yj8QX7cX1n8ppmPX47Z0qqBbCa3CTuDswu Eq3Jemo3ra/H6iGR9I2Ziew0QZjo7XNhkvyFbYsbKzetzjC7QjnFwkb7n1Xs64AmKtSG +Dx6njBcvRqTtqfi3C7HBlZN3lB+DF25Z0ZMRx9B3PrjAlcBACVAr92Kh1DQ9RX+XkYK dUPDMLm5qCamjsGccnCYXI2xlhr2a14DezdY6aEJZkpivAhpbD0S1sqZP2fPn9qfh4wa sX0g== X-Received: by 10.28.55.212 with SMTP id e203mr12052199wma.7.1446828964266; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 08:56:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cr5sm982623wjb.16.2015.11.06.08.56.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Nov 2015 08:56:02 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gnupg-2.1.* nightmare Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:56:03 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.12-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) References: <20151013175353.4e247f53d261518fff3eaf4e@gentoo.org> <5624B081.6070407@schplaf.org> <20151106183858.9ed9e06a48e7917fcb5b1f27@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20151106183858.9ed9e06a48e7917fcb5b1f27@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4701230.V5Cu6Q4zvz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201511061656.12496.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 7023f4d1-4828-404a-822c-ac4aa5d3eb97 X-Archives-Hash: 333ed2cc0b4f9000cdb8b9432c650598 --nextPart4701230.V5Cu6Q4zvz Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 06 Nov 2015 15:38:58 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:57:37 +0200 Jean-Christophe Bach wrote: > > I have a very similar problem, at least concerning your 2nd point > > (duplicated keys). All my problems came when I updated gnupg from 1.x to > > 2.x. I tried to solve them by playing with different 2.x versions but > > with the last one it is broken: > >=20 > > 1. I detect duplicated keys in the ring > > 2. some friends told me my signature was bad > > 3. I am not able to verify all the signatures with Mutt or Thunderbird > > (I do not understand why it works for some signatures and not for other= s) > > 4. with Thunderbird, I am not able anymore to sign/verify/cypher/decyph= er > >=20 > > I think that it is related to your problems, but I have no clue to fix > > that. I would also appreciate any help. >=20 > I got help on gnupg-users mail list on this issue, see > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2015-October/054569.html >=20 > Basically you need to re-import all your public keys, *delete* old > pubring.gpg file (new file format is pubring.kbx) and restart your > gpg-agent: >=20 > gpg --export-ownertrust >myownertrust.lst > gpg --export >allmykeys.gpg > rm pubring.kbx > killall gpg-agent > gpg --import =20 > First command is a backup in case something will go wrong. >=20 > Best regards, > Andrew Savchenko Thank you for letting us know about this. I have not yet updated to 2.1.* = so=20 don't know if my systems are affected. Is there an e-news item or an ebuil= d=20 message to notify the user? Perhaps you need to raise a bug, unless this=20 problem occurs only on some setups. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart4701230.V5Cu6Q4zvz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJWPNusAAoJELAdA+zwE4YeeTsH/AjfrIIe1BTnARmaH8eqFQ3H Z97iJF3epYLiCsUZLi5buDxwxd+K4ZAoWlsyb/9TqpNCfMcBwS0hS4O9D18B6gCx tX9WnWgCteQrO3oGgcMdSWkt3PYofdwIajjjuNUTgtqiiXCSwN1SoxB9d8hxGpd5 jJuxtuHY/psAdFe6yfE/Y0PXPBqF3DFk7iU26ta8ECfH7wkpnyYFTJJXPMdw9Z83 uIDjTOOgrW9SExwu1GCSD+bzawXtHc2ammbRSpfvvzw90eYPI1t3YLBqmt2WxKQy 5L9VmdOv514l9/JWEPFif+c9kR99EpPRnyRORkcaxNa803oCPkPBNZ6ddEOQqoA= =oGP1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4701230.V5Cu6Q4zvz--