* [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest @ 2015-10-01 7:43 Mick 2015-10-01 10:53 ` Rich Freeman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Mick @ 2015-10-01 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 265 bytes --] I saw this last night: /usr/bin/eclean-dist * Building file list for distfiles cleaning... * Missing digest for '/usr/portage/dev-lang/swi-prolog/swi- prolog-7.3.7.ebuild' Does it need reporting or will it be OK on the next resync? -- Regards, Mick [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest 2015-10-01 7:43 [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest Mick @ 2015-10-01 10:53 ` Rich Freeman 2015-10-01 14:04 ` Mick 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Rich Freeman @ 2015-10-01 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote: > I saw this last night: > > /usr/bin/eclean-dist > * Building file list for distfiles cleaning... > * Missing digest for '/usr/portage/dev-lang/swi-prolog/swi- > prolog-7.3.7.ebuild' > > Does it need reporting or will it be OK on the next resync? https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561966 -- Rich ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest 2015-10-01 10:53 ` Rich Freeman @ 2015-10-01 14:04 ` Mick 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Mick @ 2015-10-01 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 517 bytes --] On Thursday 01 Oct 2015 11:53:09 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote: > > I saw this last night: > > > > /usr/bin/eclean-dist > > > > * Building file list for distfiles cleaning... > > * Missing digest for '/usr/portage/dev-lang/swi-prolog/swi- > > > > prolog-7.3.7.ebuild' > > > > Does it need reporting or will it be OK on the next resync? > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561966 Thank you Rich. :-) -- Regards, Mick [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-01 14:00 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-10-01 7:43 [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest Mick 2015-10-01 10:53 ` Rich Freeman 2015-10-01 14:04 ` Mick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox