From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-167497-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6B7139BC6
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 20:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE29321C07A;
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 20:26:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE5B21C01B
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 20:25:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
	by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5ED2091C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:25:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
  by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:25:59 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
	:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=y1TeQnzNPqDs5HV2YDJ6nqmiRnk=; b=n2422
	zLWLOqQa1kK6Wxj1LMvc9nNaTx+DPMPgzA79hlpfRxB88S3OhyTTXIqVWhCqj7e/
	iJ3RdPYar6GcMXpYBA/t2GRE8RDPjx0A31CFhyYjx+HN0kNQnnT5AQO4ytViFWX5
	Sqi6h+BUUJecFzD07cT4NFOxTPM3212/4Rh3qo=
X-Sasl-enc: A1EI22PzH6M1nDEGe8WMTX3e3CDFM80n21OnS0I3EzPn 1442521558
Received: from greenbeast (c-68-42-214-119.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.42.214.119])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B1A6DC00018;
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:25:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:25:54 -0400
From: Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@alectenharmsel.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new machine : case + power
Message-ID: <20150917202554.GA1418@greenbeast>
References: <20150917030432.GE1080@ca.inter.net>
 <mtdj2r$vcd$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <loom.20150917T151035-723@post.gmane.org>
 <55FAC1D2.4040706@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55FAC1D2.4040706@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Archives-Salt: 4a592823-59c0-49b4-8ad3-749163ddb729
X-Archives-Hash: e7b7199ef81104c9839ff5c4bd26b0eb

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 03:36:18PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I have yet to see a computer that draws 350W sustained :-)
> Spikes of brief duration yes, sustained no.[1]

Normal desktops and web servers, sure. We have some GPU boxes at work
that have 8 GPUs apiece[1] in addition to 12-20 cores. They pull just a
bit more than 350W ;).

Alec

[1] http://arc-ts.umich.edu/flux/flux-configuration/#gpus