From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B6F1393F1 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A838321C019; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.web-xs.org (mail.web-xs.org [148.251.4.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC5CE081D for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.web-xs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215966EC2C16 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:23:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.web-xs.org Received: from mail.web-xs.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.web-xs.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JkxHUgB+ZBd6 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:23:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server-1.localdomain (p54A70C51.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.167.12.81]) (Authenticated sender: lukas@der-erste-sinn.de) by mail.web-xs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 846D86EC2B3B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:23:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hal9000.localdomain (hal.localdomain [192.168.0.2]) by server-1.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997A93F581 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:23:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:23:34 +0200 From: To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage directory ownerships? Message-ID: <20150915222334.59327723@hal9000.localdomain> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fcf9fdfa-51da-4f67-9529-17e645e888bb X-Archives-Hash: 866b803eee4b0b527e62fba1485f7c20 james wrote: > Hello, > > So looking at /etc/portage/repos.conf, it seems root.root owns these > files; shouldn't it be portage.portage? and /usr/portage On my system /etc/portage/repos.conf is also owned by root:root > That got me thinking. Everywhere that portage operates or owns > things, should the ownership not be portage.portage > and what would the typical permissions be? > > Is there a master list I can look at? Surely root not own all > these dirs, like /usr/portage/* ? My /usr/portage is root.root > and 755 on permissions, is that right? On my system /usr/portage/* is owned by portage:portage and permissions for directories is drwxrwsr-x and for files -rw-rw-r-- In make.conf I have usersandbox and userpriv in my FEATURES list. Dunno, but maybe this has something to do with ownership/permissions. -- Regards wabe