From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84222138D0D for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95D4EE08EF; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2C4E08E5 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDB97-000312-RR for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 14:41:46 +0200 Received: from 206.125.41.107 ([206.125.41.107]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 14:41:45 +0200 Received: from w41ter by 206.125.41.107 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 14:41:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash? Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 05:41:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20150709054138.5c3f7074@a6> References: <20150706100117.0d993a04@a6> <559E5D43.2070800@gmail.com> <20150709124824.10f75958@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.125.41.107 X-Archives-Salt: 64b05716-d6f9-4f32-a938-11d230ce027a X-Archives-Hash: eb1698d5a27ddd73e8094e7d70f91385 On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan M=C3=BCller wrote: >=20 > > As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I > > see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from coreutils, while > > the original bash source maintains an own trimmed version of > > readline.. just a thought >=20 > In that case, re-emerging Bash with USE=3D"-readline" should get rid of > the problem. >=20 > I can't test it myself as a use a superior shell to Bash I just re-emerged bash with -readline and the ebuild ignored me, apparently because I have the ncurses flag enabled. I suppose I could try disabling ncurses too, but I have no idea what to expect from that so I'll wait and hope for wisdom to strike me like a bolt of lightening.