From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A246D138CD0 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 19:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2C91E0878; Thu, 21 May 2015 19:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.web-xs.org (mail.web-xs.org [148.251.4.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6B1BE0814 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 19:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.web-xs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB3D6EC217F for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 21:45:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.web-xs.org Received: from mail.web-xs.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.web-xs.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T4ePs8H9s42S for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 21:45:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server-1.localdomain (p54A71794.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.167.23.148]) (Authenticated sender: lukas@der-erste-sinn.de) by mail.web-xs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 02E456EC216B for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 21:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hal9000.localdomain (hal.localdomain [192.168.0.2]) by server-1.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A213F5D2 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 21:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 21:44:55 +0200 From: To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [~and64] Headsup for google-chrome users Message-ID: <20150521214455.34017eb1@hal9000.localdomain> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a494a896-90ee-4515-91a2-d43b1de9e8ce X-Archives-Hash: 1c450b681df04da228085e91ce9d734d walt wrote: [...] > Then, after I figured out that CONFIG_USER_NS is a kernel config item, > requiring reinstallation of my kernel, I wasted more time figuring out > (for the n'th time) that you shouldn't just change a single kernel > config item and do "make" because that shortcut can break important > things. > > No, you should do "make clean" first, and then do "make" etc. [...] I haven't done a "make clean" for years when I compiled a kernel and I never had any problems. -- Regards wabe