From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844D3138CCE for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9D7CE087F; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0A9E084B for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wguv19 with SMTP id v19so76436270wgu.1 for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 01:55:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=HmeEfgfjhsW/xIQBbfasA9zYLPKdOpzKT8TfGvAP6CI=; b=Q3WvYaTo4a7FjvNq8CuTD8geZD7OIjqRoKkY+/IzEc/GGBikL9eP4iSoLqHWthHMYk ig+q5umHEvG+zumSx11bRS23UccdYHuEzOLTL+e79tN4Cn9T7MB51lSs+N3wgGpu0E4G QcTh8evqU1yByiHcncQ+WITsKqnagq21rsdtz11C/XZ1Op9MfBRiWxyUlUFczttqrtEg 9g0iLdVUPZ/dMLeDIztncfQEZgF57231oebFhzYblXysW2v/8qCLtfeSthv0+1GDly42 C5BTj+DeYtonwbhckx0ANKbRze5yBPNQeHiW7LIkfV5NLVAlzTQUWXknQgFfH3IS8r+p lMNg== X-Received: by 10.194.187.170 with SMTP id ft10mr3773866wjc.26.1431766550585; Sat, 16 May 2015 01:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fm8sm1942209wib.9.2015.05.16.01.55.49 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 16 May 2015 01:55:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 09:55:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.18.11-gentoo; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8628931.3Nhfjx8atu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201505160955.47041.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: da0f417a-0d8c-400c-9f21-b8bad98e2533 X-Archives-Hash: 6c61e7568291109999f92d875b027a2e --nextPart8628931.3Nhfjx8atu Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote: > 2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz : =20 > > So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32 > > globally and try to update the world once more. >=20 > Lukily, this approach worked out. Currently I am updating and recompiling > 199 packages but the blockers disappeared. >=20 > > If that will not work, I will remove the libav USE flag from > > /etc/portage/make.conf and try to update the world for the last > > time. >=20 > Now, when everything ended well, I can accept that by the phrase > "to update the world for the last time" above I meant that I was going > to switch to other Linux distribution if this issue with > ffmpeg-libav-multilib could not be solved in an elegant way, that is, > without poking with every single package, which is really ugly. >=20 > Luckily, everything ended well and I am happy to stay with Gentoo, > but I should mention that, having such issues with multilib profile, > enabling abi_x86_32 on per package base really should be unrecommended > way to maintain the system and users should be warned about it. I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would rather di= d=20 not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't need to. The=20 granular approach suits me better and also aligns better with the light-foo= ted=20 Gentoo approach. I think had you followed my suggestion you could have found that by remergi= ng=20 half a dozen packages at most, your conflict would have been resolved. Eit= her=20 way you got a result, so whatever works. :-) =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart8628931.3Nhfjx8atu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVVwYTAAoJELAdA+zwE4YeMFMH/i93JZTfFI0yKOENdw4PAtkB a/QVuvv9f7Kw2OXCIuBfRMBTaQ+4QJ18A3PKDt3IMXC45xpObFoXZnZN7C9LlEjP po1uSsWCgV9PYKwhFDxQS3APUl8DEVP5yWqY0CUXnA7muuzkEK55QRozEwsVq7/d DZtNNmYd1xP17rHxEHZItwRvW8HYnqc5zAKxVQ1YYFkr5E2BsElCMlmjKzqI2CMp WdHcdX/9m+PakU9Y4L7//dn1AqB3NLZpwvZS/a/scKVVW+3sN+lvNLnc9n4CA8Yc dsGdYDWsxSUWjMzbm9zg6R7AVcCFADrWS+iR5A95Hn7wNvnCK1AVl+ZiaB8oqDE= =Qwb5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8628931.3Nhfjx8atu--