From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-164225-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC4B138CCF
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 18:52:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4920EE0841;
	Fri, 15 May 2015 18:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14D13E0802
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 18:52:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so262612wic.0
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 11:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        bh=R2Dh1Qdv0V1NiR2toV6H+hmhUZxij77RuVcbEDrAyVs=;
        b=KzO7u+5rli2JnTF+OGksJVQIdKqron9mxZeuCVJ1/9UG6W8yGIYGusJSa+UTNr7BYM
         NrOtZVkFcWPNzXAN1S60+Z53FCcZxHNCcenZzs3GU2kTlxlVNihOwXKB0iU5xpvW+Ouz
         NJk/NayhWhQmcdyQdVnIikJSxYv8GZGRY2BbWo9xnpc/Bq3iPm8jPw/rPHBoQLM3xLZu
         dmGYQkVVd9gmdZhhAknjCCjDXqYHXKyJPSzRiTYSUdLPIrwT3Il8SPvbDcQ3dYUY9AB/
         twGrIeYdfhxw76PwaDOOq+bX+b7f34tm2Xmsp6yTyP3PJb9PPWL4rPE3UzI+U/hJeanp
         qG3A==
X-Received: by 10.180.19.100 with SMTP id d4mr36395363wie.29.1431715929935;
        Fri, 15 May 2015 11:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gs7sm4539307wib.10.2015.05.15.11.52.08
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 15 May 2015 11:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 19:51:52 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.18.11-gentoo; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; )
References: <CA+t6X7fiKHXxwo07-gvDO5w6mMqf=EvScZod_fdM=ptLLk09Aw@mail.gmail.com> <55558dda.42dfc20a.6ffb.3e3d@mx.google.com> <CAJ1xhMWhkZ92Z4nWhHJC7WryU3NMu0hX_fQhq_9aVhOzwsGiiQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1xhMWhkZ92Z4nWhHJC7WryU3NMu0hX_fQhq_9aVhOzwsGiiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart3171254.nBFGCCfIEP";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha256
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201505151952.01785.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 46674c34-cb39-4a8b-8a01-8e0585044292
X-Archives-Hash: b59d203cd5f8126c1776d41a4a7d5b80

--nextPart3171254.nBFGCCfIEP
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday 15 May 2015 18:30:29 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz <gevisz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury <redwolfe@gmail.com>
> >=20
> > wrote:
> > > I had a similar problem with some packages wanting virtual/ffmpeg  and
> > > it wouldn't take the -libav USE flag without adding a keyword for
> > > ~amd64 on the virtual.
> > > (yes, I am going the opposite way from you, but the cause seem the
> > > same -- various USE flags are not yet adjusted in the stable
> > > branches.)
> > >=20
> > > Perhaps we need to request "stabilization" for some of the newer
> > > packages to solve this.
> >=20
> > Thank you for confirming that libav USE flag do not work not only for m=
e.
> >=20
> > However, it would be interesting to hear what the Gentoo devs think abo=
ut
> > this issue.
>=20
> Portage news item No 19 has the answer you're looking for.
>=20
> > eselect news read 19
> > 2015-04-16-ffmpeg-default
> >=20
> >   Title                     FFmpeg default
> >   Author                    Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
> >   Posted                    2015-04-16
> >   Revision                  1
> >=20
> > Since the choice between ffmpeg and libav has been made more
> > explicit, there has been a lot of discussion about what the
> > default implementation should be. It can be concluded that
> > media-video/ffmpeg has wider support, and would be somewhat
> > more convenient for most end-users.
> >=20
> > For this reason the default implementation has been switched
> > back from media-video/libav to media-video/ffmpeg by removing
> > the libav useflag from the base profile.
> >=20
> > If the libav useflag is already globally enabled or disabled
> > in /etc/portage/make.conf, then no further action is required.
> >=20
> > Users who implicitly relied on libav being enabled in their
> > profile, and who wish to continue using libav, should enable
> > USE=3Dlibav in their /etc/portage/make.conf file.

No, this is not yet 100% true, or at least not true for some packages, whic=
h=20
are also pulling in abi_x86_32 versions.

I came across this problem something like a week ago on a PC with no ffmpeg=
 or=20
libav USE flags.  I tried setting USE=3D"-libav" and also +ffmpeg, but coul=
dn't=20
fix the blockers.  Eventually, I uninstalled the hard blockers like 'media-
libs/libpostproc' and then rebuilt any packages already installed which wer=
e=20
causing portage to complain/want libav.  Can't recall fully which packages=
=20
these were, k3b springs to mind.

There may be a more scientific way of resolving the conflict, but that's ho=
w I=20
got around this problem.

HTH.
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick

--nextPart3171254.nBFGCCfIEP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVVkBRAAoJELAdA+zwE4Yel+wH/RIRhQsXLNQy5kJ+yhw3+hTG
1UNzjBfYW4PQ8h8ok0IwZpisS/USU+cHCTfj/okTBrf+fPRB271t9gWrAcHEzL1Q
HmrAJgDgA4zPp9On3fsstrB7IjSoK/UFrBiFtsR9dR8ZAIbj9WSyYh1C3ETPdaGL
pSQ1ZpORYmHkE8xcscltYzHdZ9cmViK2OZPe4vL02qqNYD8twsTrSXvApyC1swVh
vz8KVPIvu1TlKt9VcTL3k5vQNpfAljbIXO31f6YiraLBvMeSsHVqhr7w4F+F2B6J
OM9ozLrvuK1913LMi+E5JL9sES15qHN4ruliDEUbN1SH1jiXkItAAJhlDxkZsI8=
=nps3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3171254.nBFGCCfIEP--