From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B28138CA2 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D417CE08B1; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16BEEE087D for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:38:57 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcy++J4CiniTKHWnzkcZlA== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (46-227-103-47.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [46.227.103.47]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.5 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id 4014cfr3LIchJFV (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve sect571r1 with 571 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:38:43 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:38:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.38-gentoo; KDE/4.14.6; x86_64; ; ) References: <5535E452.9030807@floga.de> <87tww9k3fl.fsf@nyu.edu> In-Reply-To: <87tww9k3fl.fsf@nyu.edu> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201504212038.43089.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 5d264bdd-31df-4fa8-af0a-2b615914f95d X-Archives-Hash: 636a7615d94e30386367074eac561bab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Am Dienstag, 21. April 2015, 15:37:34 schrieb gottlieb@nyu.edu: > On Tue, Apr 21 2015, Florian Gamböck wrote: > > > Am 21.04.2015 um 07:42 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > >> It's either a bug in virtual/jdk-1.7 ebuild or more likely, stable > >> request for icedtead-bin-7 is lagging behind. > > > > You are right, the stable request is still going on: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546902 > > > > Obviously the virtual got stableized a bit too fast. > > I was going to ask about this too. I noticed that the virtual/jdk-1.7 > actually gives a choice of jdk's. One of them > dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin > does have a stable 1.7 version (indeed also a stable 1.8). > > I am not anxious to switch oracle-*. > > allan > > This is a typical problem with virtuals. A virtual can (by definition) be stable as soon as one of its providers is stable. Which one does not matter, and stabilization can be pretty much automatic and be done by any dev. So, after oracle-* went stable the virtual went stable too. Now portage is trying to upgrade it and can only resolve that by either keywording icedtea-bin or switching to oracle. Which solution it ends up with differs between portage versions, I suspect... This should be improved, obviously, but it's not a trivial issue. My personal advice (without knowing the packages in detail)- if you dont want to switch to oracle, just accept the keywording suggestion from portage and give the suggested ~arch icedtea-bin a try. Don't worry too much about mixing stable and testing (as long as it's only for a few packages). - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVNpkzXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0RkJDMzI0NjNBOTIwMDY5MTQ2NkMzNDBF MTM4NkZEN0VGNEI1Nzc5AAoJEOE4b9fvS1d5C/YP/RYqNB+w+ZyK39oclbNGHSS+ mJPx1uPkYn1JR09WWkH0rpxERu0vOHxTVqntar1PRxF3/tJ7XBXhEbfa7S/Ezo+x wQi+2rNfNzaeDFIkFR/VMyu8GK/zP1zLGedVXtbWGsThiOGVjgylNxihKKtRqqFd RrF5NKJJ8ZqU940dVuZHcj8IPGZG2hWut/xKckDUYKcCwx+EhiOlBznF+qu62wnb yPDYCTIRhhRfyB7vOW0IJnqtLbCXdEHTS5Ip2N9R3cGrJiwYZMXcM+uZQoL1fpkQ x7nkthV1KzCvPsO5VsANpS1F2D1fblRHwXUAeyNmmCc1VzMgKn5d2L3uJQbxopMA IQVKWiIYb2rG+4n6i7JFqOA0MKwh0tAoNpYiYG4BaVQW+72ydx1R1zFzMX9eYav9 d4UakgUuAp2Se902PGDaM9sdiq4gcR3Ox2tM4CGr9+DFTzr/umF92OHEGMverK12 +TeozP4vloOJ0I+p3Z89BNe4CHnv71MtlM74NEq14MmSEdABek0WFOXvBkJB6ZFR zKPD2upcdxuaMYqJNTUGBL0uDQkfDdVIEtWcXapUGc0OL9lh8OCa/PPy0pZO5JmQ XdqOVjaPO2mryI4UT5J8sp4mM1zmOIHIe820Tjg72ZxzJ5iwgcHooHz1r+Cd5Yt1 PT4vFCCPaMksuhY5B4QR =x6Fh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----