From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5A6138A69 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49AC5E0949; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF46E082D for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.8]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6EA9D25844 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:34:10 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:34:10 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Machine completely broken; Ncursed! Message-ID: <20150411153410.3edb13c9@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <55292E11.9040202@verizon.net> References: <55292E11.9040202@verizon.net> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1-84-gc45ba3 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/gPWYoYqLIOlaOG7y/DPyslC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 25d247ef-c6e9-4dfc-8695-8c6602b59920 X-Archives-Hash: 28634265e07d0f892f9322f1628940ba --Sig_/gPWYoYqLIOlaOG7y/DPyslC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:22:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > And then portage did two things. >=20 > 1. It masked emul-linux -- A move that I support, it's time to see that > go. >=20 > 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 with 32 bit enabled. > ALARM: ABI_x86 should be set in exactly one place: > /etc/portage/make.conf and nowhere else. But, nevertheless, ABI_x86 WAS > set which broke the profile because my system cannot compile 32 bit > executables. That seems odd, I use several 64 bit profiles here and all of them have ABI_X86=3D"64" > Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3 > packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do > that, I need a sane profile Can't you just set ABI_X86=3D"64 -32" in make.conf? > and to know that the person who pushed out > the changes to portage, obviously without any testing whatsoever, that > broke my system so comprehensively is tortured, executed, butchered, and > then cremated. That's quite lenient, you could have left the execution until last :) --=20 Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 7: Definite maybe --Sig_/gPWYoYqLIOlaOG7y/DPyslC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlUpMOIACgkQum4al0N1GQOYDACgqcJMgbHNJtVWmzxpy6ziT22f J4gAoL6l/oNGfXgt29yQDz6Pd/JGwsMO =RU8M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/gPWYoYqLIOlaOG7y/DPyslC--