From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA58F138A6C for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 21:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B5A1E09A1; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 21:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC71E08EC for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 21:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so33559277wid.0 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:57:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=x+fmkcVM3FkldU2ojxqkhi9FCgr9AIWOInfC3rKkvTw=; b=GK+YyLHCF3adRq0d9IGhrVYYe3QWX+SbliGupFIwBLhhx3FXyZHWHHbEq2EXUm/n21 9816wtl5vX6pG4TM2uUjMc7FtXfNEvjPYDknz7sVNV+aAvKVnVBpRZ1eCCkGK4vhPFkC +bx4Ir3Mv/EdjjndGlIr3/YaPxl50WkicXYezjeU6oBODs8SpePza1dlJKmwa74gyLuK ikXEaoX+bGHBFIlZPH+tsgbk/ESzTIetH/xhMFRidn46FQCTRSt/MLD8817rJeQwVS1s YFfXTEUDKNyM8Zaqu2ryK7J9TAIz5dtWMZoSsrKzg3RGqAz3xHNIueletGc2plYzuQxi RUkQ== X-Received: by 10.194.120.230 with SMTP id lf6mr43362812wjb.78.1428443833498; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id js3sm12725209wjc.5.2015.04.07.14.57.12 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:57:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken? Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 22:57:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.18.9-gentoo; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <2929378.CsdgesgsUa@wstn> <4344475.4axkFQ20ig@wstn> <4204010.lT0cV0ubeR@wstn> In-Reply-To: <4204010.lT0cV0ubeR@wstn> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1490031.4ymbNWQyB6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201504072257.08255.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 0b9ee4b3-82f0-4321-993a-f727c4dc95be X-Archives-Hash: 4f37cb6f699007145473797f39a9d798 --nextPart1490031.4ymbNWQyB6 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 07 Apr 2015 22:48:54 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 07 April 2015 22:24:38 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > $ cat make.conf # I made a local copy and removed a lot of comments > > #CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -march=3Dcore2 -pipe" [1] >=20 > --->8 >=20 > > [1] This bothers me. Various docs tell me to specify march=3Dcore17, but > > this is an i5 CPU. Could this be my problem? >=20 > s/17/i7/ I doubt it, but is there any reason you do not use: "-march=3Dnative"=20 instead of core2 or i7 ? =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1490031.4ymbNWQyB6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVJFK0AAoJELAdA+zwE4YejBwIAJ7QH5oKc7Oda+K5SABgQGgJ B1TfCbbYN/mmYzYcvAMuqKulbMAlfj7zk4ZeisDYsEnybK8kfBN0rsDdG4+XnHIM k54aVZOfDS/DXa3T20med0SuYjLtREYiw9wwtEQBx4Y5TBU03rNEk4d07HXN+6XD mC23FtlnmB0jb1aCv77BELanvKVoOSxv6ECfsMN54yhokhTPaq/51PRWjXM3x42P 1lVSf0v+RAUJXDAYnIJbNnQg4bjhST/fBQR6aAjB/twCy5m4diwaBcLBvPBRjrc9 wD9jO2TZu314KbWvtbg/k+GMOIJQE4xw1nMDkx4jelQ0sTaA1gtmT6hfGJ+c98U= =9+LC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1490031.4ymbNWQyB6--