From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51D9138CC5 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0E2FE085B; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46B2E0849 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:44:04 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRFxIwz/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXYBBTocMwshEwERDwUlN6oRi3UIEQwFAgISEAgCAgIggz4DPBaCO2MEjVWHYYVtiECEWA X-IPAS-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRFxIwz/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXYBBTocMwshEwERDwUlN6oRi3UIEQwFAgISEAgCAgIggz4DPBaCO2MEjVWHYYVtiECEWA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,1,1400040000"; d="scan'208";a="114517488" Received: from 69-196-140-51.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([69.196.140.51]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2015 02:44:03 -0400 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 02:44:02 -0400 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 02:44:02 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Will a 64-bit-no-multilib machine cross-compile 32-bit code? Message-ID: <20150325064402.GA27920@waltdnes.org> References: <20150319015612.GA7416@waltdnes.org> <20150324071754.GB8371@waltdnes.org> <2298234.x3bRHs3aKg@navi> <20150325052057.GA21520@waltdnes.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150325052057.GA21520@waltdnes.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Archives-Salt: e2905d57-32fc-4969-8218-5262aa637d2b X-Archives-Hash: 7ed64540aa8c402a26108b3270b98a9d On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:20:57AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:01:14PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote > > > Let me know if you have any luck with pump mode, I didn't. IIRC it sort of > > worked but most compiles fell back to compiling locally so it's was actually > > slower. > > It appears to be working. It took a couple of tries to get it going. > That final required change was to /etc/distcc/hosts on the client. > Apparently the required syntax for pump mode is like so > > 192.168.123.251,cpp,lzo > > where 192.168.123.251 is the host. "cpp" enables pump mode, and "lzo" > (for compression) is also required. I originally ran... > > emerge -pv --changed-use --deep --update @world > > ...on the client. Things looked OK, so I ran > > pump emerge --changed-use --deep --update @world > > ...and let er rip. An update... I see a small number of messages like so... dev-libs:glib-2.42.2:20150325-043507.log:__________Warning: 1 pump-mode compilation(s) failed on server, but succeeded locally. There are 323 modules in dev-libs/glib-2.42.2, so 322 of them succeeded on the host, and only one had ro be done locally. I can live with that. A snippet from the logfile on the host... Mar 25 00:48:33 d531 distccd[22510]: (dcc_job_summary) client: 192.168.123.253:37977 COMPILE_OK exit:0 sig:0 core:0 ret:0 time:382ms i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/glib-2.42.2/work/glib-2.42.2/gio/gvolumemonitor.c Mar 25 00:48:35 d531 distccd[22463]: (dcc_job_summary) client: 192.168.123.253:37978 COMPILE_ERROR exit:1 sig:0 core:0 ret:0 time:240ms i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/glib-2.42.2/work/glib-2.42.2/gio/gzlibcompressor.c Mar 25 00:49:36 d531 distccd[22479]: (dcc_job_summary) client: 192.168.123.253:37979 COMPILE_OK exit:0 sig:0 core:0 ret:0 time:268ms i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/glib-2.42.2/work/glib-2.42.2/gio/ggtknotificationbackend.c -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications