From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4D3138CC4 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 801E2E09E2; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4284E09C1 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YZAF2-0004a2-1B for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 04:38:28 +0100 Received: from wsip-72-205-174-150.no.no.cox.net ([72.205.174.150]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 04:38:23 +0100 Received: from boxcars by wsip-72-205-174-150.no.no.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 04:38:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is this a bug in firefox-36.0? Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:37:59 -0500 Organization: none Message-ID: <20150320223759.163e02de@sepulchrave.remarqs> References: <20150319191516.17b8119e@sepulchrave.remarqs> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-72-205-174-150.no.no.cox.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 6f1fd6e5-8f02-416b-8f4c-813d3bf60fc5 X-Archives-Hash: c0181f902b3c5f2330ad7ff76e606bc0 On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:18:23 -0700 walt wrote: > On 03/19/2015 05:15 PM, »Q« wrote: > >> The OCSP server > >> > experienced an internal error. (Error code: > >> > sec_error_ocsp_server_error) > >> > > >> > The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the > >> > authenticity of the received data could not be verified. > > > Why didn't you say so? ;) > > > > Enter "about:config" in the address bar, search for > > "security.OCSP.require" and toggle it to false, which is the default > > (Mozilla's shipped default, at least). > > Very interesting, thanks. > > Now that I have an expert's brain to pick :) maybe you can answer two > more questions for me: > > I know I didn't change that flag myself, but something did. Do you > know if firefox extensions/addons can change the items in > about:config? I won't cop to being an expert! But yes, extensions can change settings, and AFAIK if/when that happens there is no way to tell what extension has done what to them. If an extension changed that particular setting, I'd guess it would be an extension meant to tighten security. > Second, I "fixed" the problem once by rebooting my wireless router, > but got the same error again early this morning -- which I "fixed" > once again by rebooting my wireless router. This makes me worry that > somebody out there in the evil internet might be changing the > security settings of my router (which is owned by my ISP and has > remotely updateable firmware). Sorry, I have no idea how to investigate that.