From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436E5138CC0 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04969E09F2; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9766E09EB for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YYkbB-0004qw-NS for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 01:15:37 +0100 Received: from wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net ([174.76.82.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 01:15:37 +0100 Received: from boxcars by wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 01:15:37 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is this a bug in firefox-36.0? Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:15:16 -0500 Organization: none Message-ID: <20150319191516.17b8119e@sepulchrave.remarqs> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 5ef94ca8-9ed1-4b8f-9c64-ff399eec3734 X-Archives-Hash: 5851c19bf78465ba32be08c3f289ee18 On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:41:25 -0700 walt wrote: > (BTW, I'm running firefox-bin-36.0, so the behavior may be a bit > different from the gentoo build.) > > FF will not even show me the secure att.com webpage. I get an entire > html page with this (very big) error message: > > Secure Connection Failed > > An error occurred during a connection to www.att.com. The OCSP server > experienced an internal error. (Error code: > sec_error_ocsp_server_error) > > The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the > authenticity of the received data could not be verified. Why didn't you say so? ;) Enter "about:config" in the address bar, search for "security.OCSP.require" and toggle it to false, which is the default (Mozilla's shipped default, at least). OCSP will still be checked when possible, but you shouldn't be locked out any more when it's not possible.